The Development and Evaluation of a Disease-specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Disorders of the Rotator Cuff: The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to develop a valid and reliable disease-specific quality-of-life measurement tool for patients with rotator cuff disease. DesignHealth-related quality-of-life measurement tool development. MethodsMethodology for the development and evaluation of the tool included the following: 1) identification of a specific patient population, 2) generation of potential items, 3) item reduction, 4) pretesting the prototype instrument, 5) determination of reliability, and 6) validation. ResultsThe final instrument, the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index, ‡ has 21 items representing five domains, each with a Visual Analog Scale–type response option. Construct validation demonstrated that this instrument correlated predictably with other measurement tools (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand outcome measure; American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form; University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale; Constant Score; Rowe; Sickness Impact Profile; Short Form 36; and range of motion; 21 of 21 correlations within 0.19). Reliability was very high at 2 weeks, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96 and was more responsive (sensitive to change) than the other five shoulder measurement tools, global health instruments, and range of motion. ConclusionsThis measurement tool can be used as the primary outcome in clinical trials evaluating treatments in this patient population, although its features are equally attractive for monitoring patients' progress in clinical practice.

[1]  J. Bartko Corrective Note to: “The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability” , 1974 .

[2]  N. Aaronson,et al.  The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review , 1992 .

[3]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  ALEXANDRA KIRKLEY,et al.  Scoring Systems for the Functional Assessment of the Shoulder , 2002 .

[5]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head) , 1996 .

[6]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Cs Neer,et al.  2nd. Impingement lesions. , 1983 .

[8]  A. Silman,et al.  The frequency of restricted range of movement in individuals with self-reported shoulder pain: results from a population-based survey. , 1996, British journal of rheumatology.

[9]  G. Guyatt,et al.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[10]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[11]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. , 1988, The Journal of rheumatology.

[12]  E. Olsson,et al.  Assessment of walking before and after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A comparison of different methods. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  Can the Sickness Impact Profile measure change? An example of scale assessment. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[14]  C. Wilson LESIONS OF THE SUPRASPINATUS TENDON: DEGENERATION, RUPTURE AND CALCIFICATION , 1943 .

[15]  G. Guyatt Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life: General Issues , 1997 .

[16]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  R M Kaplan,et al.  Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. , 1976, Health services research.

[18]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) , 1996, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  G. Duff,et al.  PATHOLOGIC STUDY OF DEGENERATION AND RUPTURE OF THE SUPRASPINATUS TENDON , 1943 .

[20]  I. Clarke,et al.  UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance , 1981 .

[22]  L. Bone,et al.  Orthopaedic Knowledge Update 6 , 2001 .

[23]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. , 1995, The Journal of rheumatology.

[24]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. , 1986, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[25]  Carol A. Trujillo,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey: reliability, validity, and preliminary findings in schizophrenic outpatients. , 1998, Medical care.

[26]  V C Mow,et al.  A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. , 1994, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[27]  Amstutz Hc,et al.  UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1981 .

[28]  E L Keyes,et al.  OBSERVATIONS ON RUPTURE OF THE SUPRASPINATUS TENDON BASED UPON A STUDY OF SEVENTY‐THREE CADAVERS , 1933, Annals of surgery.

[29]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[30]  M. Bergner,et al.  The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure , 1981, Medical care.

[31]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[32]  D. Beaton,et al.  Measuring Function of the Shoulder. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Five Questionnaires* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.