Biomechanical comparison of single- and dual-lead pedicle screws in cadaveric spine.

OBJECT The pedicle screw (PS) is the cornerstone of spinal instrumentation, and its failure often entails additional surgery. Screw pullout is one of the most common reasons for screw failure, particularly in the elderly population. In this study the authors undertook a biomechanical comparison of the maximum pullout force (MPF) required for single- and dual-lead PSs in cadaver vertebrae. METHODS Radiographs of 40 cadaveric vertebrae (T11-L5) were obtained, and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lateral plane using dual-x-ray absorptiometry with a bone densitometer. One screw of each design was implanted for side-by-side comparison. Vertebrae were potted and mounted on an MTS test frame for accurate measurement of MPF. A total of 80 PSs were tested, 40 each of single- and dual-lead design types. RESULTS The average MPF for dual-lead screws (533.89 +/- 285.7 N) was comparable to that of single-lead screws (524.90 +/- 311.6 N) (p = 0.3733). The BMD had a significant correlation with MPF for both dual-lead (r = 0.56413, p < 0.0001) and single-lead screws (r = 0.56327, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Barring the effect of BMD, this in vitro biomechanical test showed no significant difference in MPF between single- and dual-lead PSs. Dual-lead PSs can be used to achieve a faster insertion time, without compromising pullout force.

[1]  G. Andersson,et al.  Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength Using an Injectable Calcium Phosphate Cement as a Function of Injection Timing and Method , 2004, Spine.

[2]  J. Torner,et al.  In vitro biomechanical comparison of pedicle screws, sublaminar hooks, and sublaminar cables. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  J. Torner,et al.  Factors Affecting the Pullout Strength of Self-Drilling and Self-Tapping Anterior Cervical Screws , 2003, Spine.

[4]  S. M. Haddock,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of a Double-Threaded Pedicle Screw in Elderly Vertebrae , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  D. Benson,et al.  Segmental instrumentation for thoracic and thoracolumbar fractures: prospective analysis of construct survival and five-year follow-up. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[6]  S. Cook,et al.  Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws. an alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis. , 2001, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  S. Cook,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation and preliminary clinical experience with an expansive pedicle screw design. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[8]  S. Yerby,et al.  Revision of Failed Pedicle Screws Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Biomechanical Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[9]  R. Ellenbogen,et al.  Revision Pedicle Screws: Bigger, Longer Shims‐What Is Best? , 1998, Spine.

[10]  J. Lotz,et al.  Carbonated Apatite Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine , 1997, Spine.

[11]  D. Moore,et al.  Restoration of Pedicle Screw Fixation With an in Situ Setting Calcium Phosphate Cement , 1997, Spine.

[12]  T C Hearn,et al.  Insertional Torque and Pull‐out Strengths of Conical and Cylindrical Pedicle Screws in Cadaveric Bone , 1996, Spine.

[13]  F. Duparc,et al.  Rib graft or cement to enhance screw fixation in anterior vertebral bodies. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[15]  W. Hayes,et al.  Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength. , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  D N Kunz,et al.  Pedicle Screw Pullout Strength: Correlation with Insertional Torque , 1993, Spine.

[17]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Static and Cyclical Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Spinal Constructs , 1993, Spine.

[18]  C. Dickman,et al.  Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  J N Weinstein,et al.  Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  D. Benson,et al.  Unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures treated with the AO fixateur interne. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[21]  S. Tromanhauser,et al.  Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures and Fracture‐Dislocations , 1992, Spine.

[22]  J. Neff,et al.  Survivorship Analysis of VSP Spine Instrumentation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures , 1991, Spine.

[23]  D. E. Swartz,et al.  Importance of bone mineral density in instrumented spine fusions. , 1991, Spine.

[24]  E. Transfeldt,et al.  Experimental Pullout Testing and Comparison of Variables in Transpedicular Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Study , 1990, Spine.

[25]  J. Corin,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Systems in a Corpectomy Model , 1989, Spine.

[26]  P W Hitchon,et al.  Solitary spinal plasmacytomas: management and outcome. , 1988, Journal of spinal disorders.

[27]  M. Pope,et al.  Depth of insertion of transpedicular vertebral screws into human vertebrae: effect upon screw-vertebra interface strength. , 1988, Journal of spinal disorders.