A compact-sized surface EMG sensor for myoelectric hand prosthesis

Myoelectric prosthesis requires a sensor that can reliably capture surface electromyography (sEMG) signal from amputees for its controlled operation. The main problems with the presently available EMG devices are their extremely high cost, large response time, noise susceptibility, less amplitude sensitivity, and larger size. This paper proposes a compact and affordable EMG sensor for the prosthetic application. The sensor consists of an electrode interface, signal conditioning unit, and power supply unit all encased in a single package. The performance of dry electrodes employed in the skin interface was compared with the conventional Ag/AgCl electrodes, and the results were found satisfactory. The envelope detection technique in the sensor based on the tuned RC parameters enables the generation of smooth, faster, and repeatable EMG envelope irrespective of signal strength and subject variability. The output performance of the developed sensor was compared with commercial EMG sensor regarding signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity, and response time. To perform this, EMG data with both devices were recorded for 10 subjects (3 amputees and 7 healthy subjects). The results showed 1.4 times greater SNR values and 45% higher sensitivity of the developed sensor than the commercial EMG sensor. Also, the proposed sensor was 57% faster than the commercial sensor in producing the output response. The sEMG sensor was further tested on amputees to control the operation of a self-designed 3D printed prosthetic hand. With proportional control scheme, the myoelectric hand setup was able to provide quicker and delicate grasping of objects as per the strength of the EMG signal.

[1]  Nicola Vitiello,et al.  Proportional EMG control for upper-limb powered exoskeletons , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Mahmoud Tavakoli,et al.  Single channel surface EMG control of advanced prosthetic hands: A simple, low cost and efficient approach , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Dario Farina,et al.  The Extraction of Neural Information from the Surface EMG for the Control of Upper-Limb Prostheses: Emerging Avenues and Challenges , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Sensitivity enhancement of a flexible MEMS strain sensor by a field effect transistor in an all organic approach , 2014 .

[5]  Tamara Grujic Supuk,et al.  Design, Development and Testing of a Low-Cost sEMG System and Its Use in Recording Muscle Activity in Human Gait , 2014, Sensors.

[6]  Regina Célia da Silva Barros Allil,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Different Shapes of a Plastic Optical Fiber-Based Immunosensor for Escherichia coli: Simulation and Experimental Results , 2017, Sensors.

[7]  Valentina Agostini,et al.  An Algorithm for the Estimation of the Signal-To-Noise Ratio in Surface Myoelectric Signals Generated During Cyclic Movements , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz,et al.  Surface Electromyography Signal Processing and Classification Techniques , 2013, Sensors.

[9]  Jacob L. Segil,et al.  Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. , 2013, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  A. Kargov,et al.  Comparison of surface EMG monitoring electrodes for long-term use in rehabilitation device control , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[11]  Amit M. Joshi,et al.  Portable EMG Data Acquisition Module for Upper Limb Prosthesis Application , 2018, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[12]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[13]  A. Kargov,et al.  A comparison of the grip force distribution in natural hands and in prosthetic hands , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[14]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  Fractal analysis features for weak and single-channel upper-limb EMG signals , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  S Conforto,et al.  Extraction of the envelope from surface EMG signals. , 2001, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[16]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A wavelet-based continuous classification scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Gea Drost,et al.  Clinical applications of high-density surface EMG: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[18]  S. Grimnes Impedance measurement of individual skin surface electrodes , 1983, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[19]  Liqiong Tang,et al.  Surface EMG Signal Amplification and Filtering , 2013 .

[20]  O. Stavdahl,et al.  Control of Upper Limb Prostheses: Terminology and Proportional Myoelectric Control—A Review , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[21]  Sheroz Khan,et al.  High Quality Acquisition of Surface Electromyography – Conditioning Circuit Design , 2013 .

[22]  Elisabetta Farella,et al.  Design challenges for wearable EMG applications , 2017, Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), 2017.

[23]  V. Venkatachalam,et al.  A simple envelope detector , 1988 .

[24]  Purushothaman Geethanjali,et al.  Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review , 2016, Medical devices.

[25]  L. Bartolomeo,et al.  Design of a wireless miniature low cost EMG sensor using gold plated dry electrodes for biomechanics research , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[26]  Kianoush Nazarpour,et al.  Combined influence of forearm orientation and muscular contraction on EMG pattern recognition , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[27]  D Farina,et al.  Surface EMG Crosstalk Evaluated from Experimental Recordings and Simulated Signals , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[28]  R.F. Weir,et al.  The Optimal Controller Delay for Myoelectric Prostheses , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[29]  L. Kirkup,et al.  A direct comparison of wet, dry and insulating bioelectric recording electrodes. , 2000, Physiological measurement.

[30]  A E Grassino,et al.  Automatic assessment of electromyogram quality. , 1995, Journal of applied physiology.

[31]  V. Medved,et al.  Locomotion diagnostics: Some neuromuscular and robotic aspects , 1991, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[32]  K. Park,et al.  Flexible polymeric dry electrodes for the long-term monitoring of ECG , 2008 .

[33]  Manfredo Atzori,et al.  Comparison of six electromyography acquisition setups on hand movement classification tasks , 2017, PloS one.

[34]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[35]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  A. Patla Some characteristics of EMG patterns during locomotion: implications for the locomotor control process. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  Kyung-Soo Kim,et al.  A finely machined toothed silver electrode surface for improved acquisition of EMG signals , 2018, 2018 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[38]  Alexandre Balbinot,et al.  A Neuro-Fuzzy System for Characterization of Arm Movements , 2013, Sensors.

[39]  Mats Djupsjöbacka,et al.  Acquisition, Processing and Analysis of the Surface Electromyogram , 1999 .

[40]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  Surface electromyographic signals using a dry electrode , 2011, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Medical Measurements and Applications.

[41]  Ping Zhou,et al.  A Novel Myoelectric Pattern Recognition Strategy for Hand Function Restoration After Incomplete Cervical Spinal Cord Injury , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.