Home cage presentation of complex discrimination tasks to marmosets and rhesus monkeys

The study reported here demonstrates the feasibility of presenting cognitive tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) to either marmosets or rhesus monkeys in their home cages. This location of testing offers opportunities for the measurement of additional indices, for example spontaneous behaviour (Prowse et al. 1995) and electrophysiology (Pearce et al. 1998) as well as facilitating repeated test presentation. Results from 12 marmosets and 4 rhesus monkeys which have completed several sequences of an eight-stage discrimination task involving simple discriminations, compound discriminations and reversals are reported. The paradigm developed has application in long-term studies. Tests from CANTAB have been used extensively in normal humans (Robbins et al. 1994) as well as a range of patient groups (Owen et al. 1992, Elliott et al. 1995) and to assess drug effects (Coull et al. 1996). Additionally some of these tests have been presented to marmosets (Roberts et al. 1988) to examine neuropsychological functioning. This comparative approach facilitates meaningful cross species comparison, particularly in the study of the effects of pharmacological intervention.

[1]  T. Robbins,et al.  A specific form of cognitive rigidity following excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain in marmosets , 1992, Neuroscience.

[2]  C. Marsden,et al.  Fronto-striatal cognitive deficits at different stages of Parkinson's disease. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  T. Robbins,et al.  Sparing of attentional relative to mnemonic function in a subgroup of patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  T. Crow,et al.  A new approach to the role of noradrenaline in learning: Problem-solving in the marmoset after α-noradrenergic receptor blockade , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  The effects of intradimensional and extradimensional shifts on visual discrimination learning in humans and non-human primates , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  D R MEYER,et al.  Learning sets in marmosets. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  H E ROSVOLD,et al.  One-trial objectdiscrimination learning in monkeys with frontal lesions. , 1962, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  E. A. Berg,et al.  A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. , 1948, The Journal of general psychology.

[9]  T. Robbins,et al.  The effects of excitotoxic lesions of the basal forebrain on the acquisition, retention and serial reversal of visual discriminations in marmosets , 1990, Neuroscience.

[10]  C T Snowdon,et al.  Color discrimination by the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus oedipus) and its relation to fruit coloration. , 1987, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[11]  D. A. Grant,et al.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  T. Robbins,et al.  Neuropsychological evidence for frontostriatal dysfunction in schizophrenia , 1995, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  H. Harlow,et al.  The formation of learning sets. , 1949, Psychological review.

[14]  A C Roberts,et al.  6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the prefrontal cortex in monkeys enhance performance on an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sort Test: possible interactions with subcortical dopamine , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  T. Robbins,et al.  Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts , 1996, Nature.