Letter processing and font information during reading: Beyond distinctiveness, where vision meets design

Letter identification is a critical front end of the reading process. In general, conceptualizations of the identification process have emphasized arbitrary sets of distinctive features. However, a richer view of letter processing incorporates principles from the field of type design, including an emphasis on uniformities across letters within a font. The importance of uniformities is supported by a small body of research indicating that consistency of font increases letter identification efficiency. We review design concepts and the relevant literature, with the goal of stimulating further thinking about letter processing during reading.

[1]  T. Sanocki.  Interaction of scale and time during object identification. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Configuration influence on crowding. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[3]  T. Sanocki,et al.  Font regularity constraints on the process of letter recognition. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  T. Sanocki.  Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Paul Luna.  Understanding Type for Desktop Publishing , 1992 .

[6]  G. M. Reicher.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  D. Broadbent.  Levels, Hierarchies, and the Locus of Control* , 1977 .

[8]  Evelyne Corcos,et al.  Visual Processes in Reading and Reading Disabilities , 1993 .

[9]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  R. Cowie,et al.  The perception of structure , 1997 .

[11]  S. Sternberg.  The discovery of processing stages , 1969 .

[12]  R B Friedman,et al.  Identity without form: Abstract representations of letters , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Visual Features, Preperceptual Storage, and Processing Time in Reading , 1975 .

[14]  T. Sanocki.  Effects of font- and letter-specific experience on the perceptual processing of letters , 1992 .

[15]  G. Oden.  Dependence, independence, and emergence of word features. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[17]  T. Sanocki,et al.  Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Clues to a letter's recognition: Implications for the design of characters. , 1969 .

[19]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  The PIG in sPrInG: Evidence on letter grouping from the reading of buried words , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Rob Carter,et al.  Typographic Design: Form and Communication , 1985 .

[22]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Rethinking Implicit Memory , 2002 .

[23]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[24]  E. Gibson.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[25]  Qiong Zhang,et al.  The Structures of Letters and Symbols throughout Human History Are Selected to Match Those Found in Objects in Natural Scenes , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[26]  D. Bub,et al.  Features for Identification of Uppercase and Lowercase Letters , 2008, Psychological science.

[27]  T Sanocki.  Looking for a Structural Network: Effects of Changing Size and Style on Letter Recognition , 1991, Perception.

[28]  R. Shepard.  Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Letter recognition: From perception to representation , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  J. Grainger,et al.  Letter perception: from pixels to pandemonium , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Font Tuning Associated with Expertise in Letter Perception , 2006, Perception.

[32]  D. Pelli,et al.  Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: distinguishing feature integration from detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[33]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[34]  Aries Arditi,et al.  Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision , 2007, Vision Research.

[35]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  E. Gibson,et al.  Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1973 .

[37]  Dominic W. Massaro,et al.  Visual Information Processing in Reading , 1993 .

[38]  D. D. Wheeler.  Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[39]  Gordon H. Sellon.  Symposium Summary , 2022 .

[40]  Susana T. L. Chung,et al.  Reading Speed Benefits from Increased Vertical Word Spacing in Normal Peripheral Vision , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  Herbert Spencer,et al.  The visible word , 1969 .

[42]  Thomas Sanocki.  Intra- and interpattern relations in letter recognition. , 1991 .

[43]  Leslie Henderson,et al.  Orthographies and reading : perspectives from cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and linguistics , 1984 .

[44]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Influence of type form on speed of reading. , 1928 .

[45]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Making sentences make sense, or words to that effect , 1991 .

[46]  H. Bouma.  Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[47]  D. Pelli,et al.  Feature detection and letter identification , 2006, Vision Research.

[48]  Refractor.  Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[49]  G C Oden,et al.  A fuzzy logical model of letter identification. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  H. Burian,et al.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes. , 1962, American journal of ophthalmology.

[52]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[53]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Global stimulus configuration modulates crowding. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[54]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  Influence of line width on eye movements , 1940 .

[55]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Effects of talker variability on recall of spoken word lists. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction , 2008 .

[57]  G. Keren,et al.  Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[59]  Xuefei Gao,et al.  Visual noise disrupts conceptual integration in reading , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  D. Pelli,et al.  Parts, Wholes, and Context in Reading: A Triple Dissociation , 2007, PloS one.

[61]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  M. Tinker.  Legibility of print , 1963 .

[63]  T. Sanocki,et al.  Effects of early common features on form perception , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[64]  Pierluigi Zoccolotti,et al.  Length Effect in Word Naming in Reading: Role of Reading Experience and Reading Deficit in Italian Readers , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[65]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Constructing structural descriptions , 1999 .

[66]  P H Seymour,et al.  Effects of Visual Familiarity on “Same” and “Different” Decision Processes , 1978, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  Robert A. Morris,et al.  Raster imaging and digital typography II , 1991 .

[68]  Jeffrey S Bowers,et al.  Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  Gregory R. Lockhead,et al.  Making Letters Distinctive. , 1980 .

[70]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[71]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[72]  Gregory B. Simpson,et al.  Understanding word and sentence , 1991 .

[73]  Tamiko Azuma,et al.  Font-Specific Memory: More than Meets the Eye? , 2012 .

[74]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye movements when reading transposed text: the importance of word-beginning letters. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  Thomas Sanocki.  Interaction of scale and time during object recognition , 2001 .

[76]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[77]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Character complexity and redundancy in writing systems over human history , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  M. Mozer.  Letter migration in word perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[79]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Parafoveal processing within and between words , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[80]  Caroline Blais,et al.  The spatio-temporal dynamics of visual letter recognition , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[81]  Karen Cheng,et al.  Designing Type , 2020 .

[82]  D W Corcoran,et al.  An Aspect of Perceptual Organization Involved in Reading Typed and Handwritten Words , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[83]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[84]  Evan F. Risko,et al.  Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[85]  G. Gilmore,et al.  Letters are visual stimuli: A comment on the use of confusion matrices , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[86]  Theodore G. Birdsall,et al.  Definitions of d′ and η as Psychophysical Measures , 1958 .

[87]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[88]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[89]  James Sir Pitman,et al.  Alphabets and reading;: The initial teaching alphabet, , 1969 .

[90]  K. Larson,et al.  Design Improvements for Frequently Misrecognized Letters , 2010 .

[91]  Tracey D. Berger,et al.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[92]  Alexander I. Rudnicky,et al.  Size and case of type as stimuli in reading. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[93]  J. L. Mcclelland.  Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[94]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[95]  T. Sanocki.  Perception : Font-Specific , Schematic Tuning , 2011 .

[96]  P. Walker,et al.  Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence , 2008 .

[97]  Edward Johnston,et al.  Writing & Illuminating, & Lettering , 1913 .

[98]  Manuel Perea,et al.  The overlap model: a model of letter position coding. , 2008, Psychological review.