fMRI language task panel improves determination of language dominance

Background: fMRI language tasks reliably identify language areas in presurgical epilepsy patients, but activation using single paradigms may disagree with the intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT). Objective: To determine whether a panel of fMRI tasks targeting different aspects of language processing increases accuracy in determining hemisphere language dominance. Methods: Twenty-six patients age 12 to 56 years, predominantly with temporal lobe epilepsy, were studied using whole-brain 1.5 T fMRI (echo planar imaging, blood oxygenation level–dependent) with three task categories using a block design: verbal fluency, reading comprehension, and auditory comprehension. fMRI t maps were visually rated at three thresholds. All patients had assessment of language lateralization by IAT. Results: fMRI showed left dominance in 21 patients, right dominance in 2, and bilateral activation in 2; raters disagreed over a left vs right bilateral rating in 1 patient. There was full agreement between IAT and fMRI in 21 of 25 patients (IAT failed in 1). In three instances of partial disparity with IAT, the fMRI panel showed consistent findings across raters. Agreement between raters was excellent (partial disagreement in only one patient); the panel of tasks was superior to any single task for interrater agreement (Cramer V 0.93 [range 0.91 to 1.0] vs 0.72 [range 0.60 to 0.86]). Conclusions: A panel of fMRI language paradigms may be more accurate for evaluating partial epilepsy patients than a single task. A panel of tasks reduces the likelihood of nondiagnostic findings, improves interrater reliability, and helps confirm language laterality.

[1]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of language dominance in children and adolescents with functional MRI , 1997, Neurology.

[2]  William D Gaillard,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of left hemisphere language dominance in children. , 2002, Archives of neurology.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language , 1997, Neuroreport.

[4]  Guillén Fernández,et al.  Language Mapping in Less Than 15 Minutes: Real-Time Functional MRI during Routine Clinical Investigation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[5]  D. Caplan,et al.  Processing of Visually Presented Sentences in Mandarin and English Studied with fMRI , 1999, Neuron.

[6]  Margaret S. McGill,et al.  Subject Index Vol. 57, Suppl. 1, 2001 , 2004, Hormone Research in Paediatrics.

[7]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Language dominance determined by whole brain functional MRI in patients with brain lesions , 1999, Neurology.

[8]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Reproducibility of fMRI-Determined Language Lateralization in Individual Subjects , 2002, Brain and Language.

[9]  J. Duncan,et al.  Is it time to replace the Wada test? , 2003, Neurology.

[10]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Determination of language dominance using functional MRI , 1996, Neurology.

[11]  Aesop The Aesop for Children , 1928 .

[12]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[13]  G McCarthy,et al.  Comparative localization of auditory comprehension by using functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical stimulation. , 1999, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  J. Pujol,et al.  Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI , 1999, Neurology.

[15]  M Erb,et al.  Early left periventricular brain lesions induce right hemispheric organization of speech , 2001, Neurology.

[16]  S. Sato,et al.  Language dominance in partial epilepsy patients identified with an fMRI reading task , 2002, Neurology.

[17]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional Specialization for Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. J. M. Rutten,et al.  fMRI-Determined Language Lateralization in Patients with Unilateral or Mixed Language Dominance According to the Wada Test , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  Stéphane Lehéricy,et al.  Arteriovenous brain malformations: is functional MR imaging reliable for studying language reorganization in patients? Initial observations. , 2002, Radiology.

[20]  K Kuppusamy,et al.  Localization of language cortices by functional MR imaging compared with intracarotid amobarbital hemispheric sedation. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Byron Bernal,et al.  False lateralization of language cortex on functional MRI after a cluster of focal seizures. , 2002, Neurology.

[22]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[23]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  15O water positron emission tomography in language localization: A study comparing positron emission tomography visual and computerized region of interest analysis with the wada test , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[24]  J. Kassubek,et al.  Determination of hemisphere dominance for language: comparison of frontal and temporal fMRI activation with intracarotid amytal testing , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[25]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. , 1997, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects , 1999 .

[27]  F. Woermann,et al.  Language lateralization by Wada test and fMRI in 100 patients with epilepsy , 2003, Neurology.

[28]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Functional MR evaluation of temporal and frontal language dominance compared with the Wada test , 2000, Neurology.

[29]  R. Woods,et al.  Recovery from wernicke's aphasia: A positron emission tomographic study , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[30]  Conrad Kufta,et al.  Semantic, Phonological, and Perceptual Changes Following Left and Right Intracarotid Injection (Wada) with a Low Amytal Dosage , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  J. Petrella,et al.  Developmental aspects of language processing: fMRI of verbal fluency in children and adults , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[32]  E. Achten,et al.  Developing a comprehensive presurgical functional MRI protocol for patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: a pilot study , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[33]  W. Gaillard,et al.  Auditory comprehension of language in young children , 2003, Neurology.

[34]  Peter T. Fox,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the cerebral hemispheric dominance for language with CBF PET , 1993 .

[35]  B. Schlaggar,et al.  Is it time to replace the Wada test? , 2002, Neurology.

[36]  W H Theodore,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during auditory responsive naming: evidence for cross‐modality neural activation , 1998, Neuroreport.

[37]  J. Petrella,et al.  Cortical localization of reading in normal children , 2001, Neurology.

[38]  Nader Pouratian,et al.  Utility of preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging for identifying language cortices in patients with vascular malformations. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[39]  N. F. Ramsey,et al.  Combined Analysis of Language Tasks in fMRI Improves Assessment of Hemispheric Dominance for Language Functions in Individual Subjects , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  W H Theodore,et al.  A direct comparison of PET activation and electrocortical stimulation mapping for language localization , 1997, Neurology.

[41]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  The use of fMRI in neocortical epilepsy. , 2000, Advances in neurology.

[42]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:1–13(1998) � Functional MRI Studies of Auditory Comprehension , 2022 .

[43]  V. Haughton,et al.  Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[44]  R T Constable,et al.  Functional MRI of Language Processing: Dependence on Input Modality and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 2001, Epilepsia.