Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data

We recorded 3D coordinates for 28 mandibular landmarks from three‐dimensional reconstructions of CT axial slices using the image analysis program eTDIPS. The images were acquired from a pediatric series of human mandibles (neonate to 13 years of age) from the Bosma collection (Shapiro and Richtsmeier, 1997 , Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103:415–416). To test the accuracy of these coordinate data, we recorded the same 28 landmarks directly on the Bosma mandibles using a Polhemus 3Space digitizer. The directly digitized landmarks serve as a gold standard upon which to evaluate the eTDIPS data. Standard deviations of landmark placement using eTDIPS show a greater degree of variation compared to the data gathered using the digitizer, although this error is more heavily concentrated in certain types of landmarks. All possible linear distances between unique pairs of landmarks were calculated, and like linear distances were compared between the two data collection methods. The absolute difference for all like linear distances ranged from 0.001–3.9 mm (mean = 0.377 mm; SD = 1.136), with the eTDIPS data being consistently larger than the digitizer coordinates. This study demonstrates that landmark coordinate data can be reliably collected from digital CT images of the human mandible. We define a set of mandibular landmarks useful in evaluating the effects of craniofacial disorders, growth and other biological processes. Clin. Anat. 16:494–500, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J T Richtsmeier,et al.  Parallels of craniofacial maldevelopment in down syndrome and Ts65Dn mice , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[2]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. , 1984, Radiology.

[3]  J T Richtsmeier,et al.  Brief communication: a sample of pediatric skulls available for study. , 1997, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  C J Valeri,et al.  Preoperative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis. , 1998, Journal of craniofacial genetics and developmental biology.

[5]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Morphometric tools for landmark data , 1993 .

[6]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  Three‐dimensional morphological analysis of isolated metopic synostosis , 1999, The Anatomical record.

[7]  Thomas E. Wehrly,et al.  An Invariant Approach to Statistical Analysis of Shapes , 2004, Technometrics.

[8]  J. Richtsmeier,et al.  The effect of neurocranial surgery on basicranial morphology in isolated sagittal craniosynostosis. , 2001, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[9]  H. Seidler,et al.  Endocranial capacity in an early hominid cranium from Sterkfontein, South Africa. , 1998, Science.

[10]  C. H. Paik,et al.  Precision, repeatability, and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. , 1995, The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association.

[11]  J. L. Thompson,et al.  A new reconstruction of the Le Moustier 1 skull and investigation of internal structures using 3-D-muCT data. , 1998, Journal of human evolution.

[12]  S. Fernbach,et al.  The deformed petrous bone: a new plain film sign of premature lambdoid synostosis. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  G. Müller,et al.  A comparative study of stereolithographically modelled skulls of Petralona and Broken Hill: implications for future studies of middle Pleistocene hominid evolution. , 1997, Journal of human evolution.

[14]  M W Vannier,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement accuracy of skull surface landmarks. , 1988, American journal of physical anthropology.

[15]  S. Yilmaz,et al.  Anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral canal in cervical region: Comparison of anatomical, computed tomographic, and plain film measurements , 2001, Clinical anatomy.

[16]  Value of 3D imaging for the study of craniofacial malformations in children. , 1991, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[17]  W. Reardon,et al.  Craniosynostosis. Diagnosis, evaluation and management. , 2000, Journal of medical genetics.

[18]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. , 1998 .

[19]  Fred Spoor,et al.  Imaging skeletal growth and evolution , 2000 .

[20]  R. Martin,et al.  Neanderthal computer skulls , 1995, Nature.

[21]  C J Valeri,et al.  Capturing data from three-dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. , 1998, American journal of physical anthropology.