Value of Intraoperative 3D Imaging on the Quality of Reduction of the Distal Tibiofibular Joint When Using a Suture-Button System

Background: The quality of reduction of the distal tibiofibular joint (DTFJ) has a major impact on the outcome. Novel suture-button systems as well as intraoperative 3D imaging can be applied to increase the quality of DTFJ reduction intraoperatively. The individual effect of either remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the value of intraoperative 3D imaging on the quality of reduction of the DTFJ when using a suture-button system. Methods: Retrospective, radiographic study including adult patients who underwent surgical stabilization of the syndesmosis with a suture-button system for acute, unilateral, unstable syndesmotic injuries with postoperative bilateral CT imaging. The use of an intraoperative 3D scan was the individual surgeon’s choice. Assessed was whether the intraoperative 3D imaging had an influence on the postoperative quality of DTFJ reduction and revision rates. These findings were put in perspective to the correction potential of the suture-button system. Results: A total of 147 patients were included; 76 of these received an intraoperative 3D imaging. Neither the rate of formal malreduction (17% vs 17%) nor the postoperative revision rate (4% vs 3%) differed significantly between patients with or without intraoperative 3D imaging. Intraoperative 3D imaging revealed a false-negative rate of 14%. The intrinsic correction potential of the suture-button system reduced the number of formally malreduced DTFJs in both groups by 51%. Conclusion: The additional value of intraoperative 3D imaging to assess the quality of DTFJ reduction in our series did not improve syndesmotic reduction when using a flexible suture-button system. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative cohort study.

[1]  W. Böcker,et al.  Compensation of Dynamic Fixation Systems in the Quality of Reduction of Distal Tibiofibular Joint in Acute Syndesmotic Complex Injuries: A CT-Based Analysis , 2022, Foot & ankle international.

[2]  J. Niinimäki,et al.  Suture button versus syndesmosis screw fixation in pronation-external rotation ankle fractures: A minimum 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. , 2021, Injury.

[3]  J. Nguyen,et al.  Assessment of malreduction standards for the syndesmosis in bilateral CT scans of uninjured ankles. , 2021, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in ankle syndesmotic reduction , 2020, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[5]  Joshua L. Gary,et al.  Effect of Intraoperative Multidimensional Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional Fluoroscopy on Syndesmotic Reduction. , 2020, Foot & ankle international.

[6]  F. Frihagen,et al.  Better outcome for suture button compared with single syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury: five-year results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  H. Schmal,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Treatment of Ankle Fractures With Syndesmotic Rupture: Suture-Button Fixation Versus Cortical Screw Fixation. , 2019, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[8]  P. Phisitkul,et al.  Anatomic Ligament Repairs of Syndesmotic Injuries. , 2019, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[9]  A. Lawendy,et al.  Improved Reduction of the Tibiofibular Syndesmosis With TightRope Compared With Screw Fixation: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study. , 2019, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  E. Hurley,et al.  Suture Button Versus Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injuries: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2018, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  F. Frihagen,et al.  Randomized Trial Comparing Suture Button with Single Syndesmotic Screw for Syndesmosis Injury , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  Lower complication rate and faster return to sports in patients with acute syndesmotic rupture treated with a new knotless suture button device , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[13]  A. Rehman,et al.  A simplified, validated protocol for measuring fibular reduction on ankle CT. , 2017, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[14]  Jani P. A. Katisko,et al.  A prospective randomised study comparing TightRope and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy and maintenance of syndesmotic reduction assessed with bilateral computed tomography. , 2015, Injury.

[15]  M. Liebergall,et al.  Intraoperative syndesmotic reduction: three-dimensional versus standard fluoroscopic imaging. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Jochen Franke,et al.  Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  J. Hermans,et al.  Anatomy of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis in adults: a pictorial essay with a multimodality approach , 2010, Journal of anatomy.

[18]  H. Bolhuis,et al.  Which ankle fractures require syndesmotic stabilization? , 2007, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[19]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Predictors of Functional Outcome Following Transsyndesmotic Screw Fixation of Ankle Fractures , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[20]  W. D. Hovis,et al.  Treatment of Syndesmotic Disruptions of the Ankle with Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  C. Court-Brown,et al.  Adult ankle fractures--an increasing problem? , 1998, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  K. Yamaguchi,et al.  Operative Treatment of Syndesmotic Disruptions Without Use of a Syndesmotic Screw: A Prospective Clinical Study , 1994, Foot & ankle international.

[23]  U. Lindsjö,et al.  Operative treatment of ankle fractures. , 1981, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[24]  P. Ramsey,et al.  Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.