Pipe-Soil Interaction during Lateral Buckling and Pipeline Walking — The SAFEBUCK JIP

This paper addresses the influence of pipe-soil interaction on the design of pipelines susceptible to lateral buckling and pipeline-walking. The pipe-soil response is the largest uncertainty in the design of such systems, and has a significant influence on the structural limit states. Generic guidance has been developed to guide the design process, but project-specific physical model testing is often necessary, and new advancements in the understanding of pipe-soil interaction are rapidly being made. Force-displacement response models were developed during Phase I of the Safebuck joint-industry project (JIP) based on largeand small-scale tests carried out by the Safebuck JIP and project-specific test data donated by JIP participants. These models are currently being applied by JIP participants on a number of projects, to quantify the susceptibility to lateral buckling and pipeline walking, and design safe and effective means to control these phenomena. However, of all the design parameters, the soil response causes the greatest uncertainty in design because of the extreme sensitivity of design solutions to the axial and lateral resistance imposed by the soil. Improving the understanding of pipe-soil response provides the greatest scope for refining the design of such systems. The purpose of this paper is to outline the significant influence that pipe-soil interaction has on the pipeline design process and highlight the ways in which the uncertainty in pipe-soil resistance severely complicates pipeline design. The paper then reviews and updates previous force-displacement-response models (published at OTC 2006) incorporating more recent experience from large and small-scale tests. Significant new data is included to illustrate the behaviour of ‘heavy’ pipes, which display a lateral response that differs significantly from most previously-published data, mostly related to ‘light’ pipes. The response of soil berms during cyclic lateral loading is also highlighted, demonstrating the cumulative rise in lateral pipe restraint.

[1]  David A.S. Bruton,et al.  The Influence of Pipeline Insulation on Installation Temperature, Effective Force and Pipeline Buckling , 2007 .

[2]  M. Randolph,et al.  Physical and numerical simulation of shallow penetration of a cylindrical object into soft clay , 2008 .

[3]  Christophe Gaudin,et al.  Mechanisms of pipe embedment and lateral breakout on soft clay , 2008 .

[4]  W. A. Take,et al.  Soil deformation measurement using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and photogrammetry , 2003 .

[5]  Shadi Najjar,et al.  Tilt Table Test for Interface Shear Resistance Between Flowlines and Soils , 2003 .

[6]  Bolton,et al.  A technique for modelling the lateral stability of on-bottom pipelines in a small drum centrifuge , 2006 .

[7]  J. D. Murff,et al.  PIPE PENETRATION IN COHESIVE SOIL , 1989 .

[8]  Andrew Palmer,et al.  Touchdown indentation of the seabed , 2008 .

[9]  R. Verley,et al.  A Soil Resistance Model for Pipelines Placed on Sandy Soils , 1994 .

[10]  David White,et al.  Modelling the soil resistance on seabed pipelines during large cycles of lateral movement , 2008 .

[11]  Christophe Gaudin,et al.  Cyclic Tests of Model Pipe in Kaolin , 2008 .

[12]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Seabed Characterisation And Models For Pipeline-Soil Interaction , 2007 .

[13]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Characterisation of soft sediments for offshore applications , 2004 .

[14]  Massimo Callegari,et al.  Simple analytical models for the J-lay problem , 2005 .

[15]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Upper-bound yield envelopes for pipelines at shallow embedment in clay , 2008 .

[16]  Mark Randolph,et al.  The effect of pipe-soil interface conditions on undrained breakout resistance of partially-embedded pipelines , 2008 .

[17]  Thomas Langford,et al.  Offshore Pipeline and Riser Geotechnical Model Testing: Practice and Interpretation , 2007 .

[18]  Roy E. Olson,et al.  Shear and interface strength of clay at very low effective stress , 2003 .

[19]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  Pipe-Soil Interaction Behaviour during Lateral Buckling , 2006 .

[20]  Mark Randolph,et al.  MODELING OF SHALLOWLY EMBEDDED OFFSHORE PIPELINES IN CALCAREOUS SAND , 2002 .

[21]  G. E. Harrison,et al.  King Flowlines - Thermal Expansion Design and Implementation , 2003 .

[22]  David White,et al.  UPPER BOUND PLASTICITY ANALYSIS OF A PARTIALLY-EMBEDDED PIPE UNDER COMBINED VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOADING , 2008 .

[23]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Analysis of the undrained breakout resistance of partially embedded pipelines. , 2007 .

[24]  David A.S. Bruton,et al.  Pipeline Walking-Understanding the Field Layout Challenges, and Analytical Solutions Developed for the SAFEBUCK JIP , 2006 .

[25]  Andrew John Hill,et al.  In-Situ Measurement of Pipe-Soil Interaction in Deep Water , 2008 .

[26]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Pipeline Embedment in deep water: processes and quantitative assessment , 2008 .