Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe

1. Most temperate rivers are heavily regulated and characterised by incised channels, aggradated floodplains and modified hydroperiods. As a consequence, former extensive aquatic/terrestrial transition zones lack most of their basic ecological functions. 2. Along large rivers in Europe and North America, various floodplain restoration or rehabilitation projects have been planned or realised in recent years. However, restoration ecology is still in its infancy and the literature pertinent to river restoration is rather fragmented. (Semi-) aquatic components of floodplains, including secondary channels, disconnected and temporary waters as well as marshes, have received little attention, despite their significant contribution to biological diversity. 3. Many rehabilitation projects were planned or realised without prior knowledge of their potential for success or failure, although, these projects greatly contributed to our present understanding of river-floodplain systems. 4. River rehabilitation benefits from a consideration of river ecosystem concepts in quantitative terms, comparison with reference conditions, historical or others, and the establishment of interdisciplinary partnerships. 5. We present examples from two large European rivers, the Danube and the Rhine, in which the role of aquatic connectivity has been extensively studied. The Danube delta with its diversity of floodplain lakes across an immense transversal gradient (up to 10 km) serves as a reference system for restoration projects along lowland sections of large rivers such as the Rhine in the Netherlands.

[1]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restoration , 2001 .

[2]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Ecological Aspects of the Restoration Strategy for a River-Floodplain System on the Danube River in Austria , 1997 .

[3]  D. Wakelin.  Parasites and the Immune System , 1997 .

[4]  Yao Yin,et al.  Naturalization of the flood regime in regulated rivers the case of the upper Mississippi River , 1998 .

[5]  R. Sparks,et al.  THE NATURAL FLOW REGIME. A PARADIGM FOR RIVER CONSERVATION AND RESTORATION , 1997 .

[6]  Ward,et al.  Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology , 2001 .

[7]  Freshwater Ecosystems and Their Management: A National Initiative , 1995, Science.

[8]  W. Adams,et al.  Scientific and institutional constraints on the restoration of European floodplains , 1999, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[9]  F. Douglas Shields,et al.  Can Large Rivers Be Restored?Most restoration projects are only attempts to rehabilitate selected river sections to a predetermined structure and functio , 1995 .

[10]  W. Richardson,et al.  Past, Present, and Future Concepts in Large River Ecology How rivers function and how human activities influence river processes , 1995 .

[11]  K. Tockner,et al.  An extension of the flood pulse concept. , 2000 .

[12]  Claude Amoros,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I. A scientific base , 1995 .

[13]  H. Middelkoop,et al.  Potential for floodplain rehabilitation based on historical maps and present-day processes along the River Rhine, The Netherlands , 1999, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[14]  Klement Tockner,et al.  Conservation by restoration: the management concept for a river-floodplain system on the Danube River in Austria , 1998 .

[15]  S. Woelfl,et al.  Chlorella‐bearing ciliates dominate in an oligotrophic North Patagonian lake (Lake Pirehueico, Chile): abundance, biomass and symbiotic photosynthesis , 2002 .

[16]  W. Michener,et al.  Policy Forum: Policy implications of recent natural and managed floods , 1998 .

[17]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept of large rivers: learning from the tropics , 2001 .

[18]  J. Hanganu,et al.  Classification of Danube Delta lakes based on aquatic vegetation and turbidity , 1999, Hydrobiologia.

[19]  Koos Wieriks,et al.  Integrated water management for the Rhine river basin, from pollution prevention to ecosystem improvement , 1997 .

[20]  G. Petts,et al.  Historical Change of Large Alluvial Rivers: Western Europe , 1989 .

[21]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Rehabilitation of rivers for fish , 1998 .

[22]  F. Schiemer,et al.  ENDANGERED FISH SPECIES OF THE DANUBE RIVER IN AUSTRIA , 1989 .

[23]  N. Asselman.  The use of floodplain sedimentation measurements to evaluate the effects of river restoration works , 1999, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[24]  A. Siepe,et al.  Regeneration of Floodplain Biotopes on the Upper Rhine – The “Polder Altenheim” Case , 1994 .

[25]  Clifford N. Dahm,et al.  An Ecosystem View of the Restoration of the Kissimmee River , 1995 .

[26]  David L. Galat,et al.  Conserving large-river fishes: is the highway analogy an appropriate paradigm? , 2001, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  P. Bayley.  The flood pulse advantage and the restoration of river‐floodplain systems , 1991 .

[28]  R. E. Grift,et al.  Restoration of the river-floodplain interaction: benefits for the fish community in the River Rhine , 2001 .

[29]  F. Schiemer.  Conservation of biodiversity in floodplain rivers , 1999 .

[30]  Joanne Chamberlain,et al.  Hydrologic Manipulations of the Channelized Kissimmee River Implications for restoration , 1998 .

[31]  Hans Middelkoop,et al.  Embanked floodplains in the Netherlands : geomorphological evolution over various time scales , 1997 .

[32]  Stefan Schmutz,et al.  Fundamentals of fish ecological integrity and their relation to the extended serial discontinuity concept , 2000 .

[33]  D. Olson,et al.  The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions , 1998 .

[34]  I. Zsuffa,et al.  Multi-criteria decision support for the revitalisation of river floodplains , 2001 .

[35]  Richard E. Sparks,et al.  Need for Ecosystem Management of Large Rivers and Their Floodplains These phenomenally productive ecosystems produce fish and wildlife and preserve species , 1995 .

[36]  Thomas Hein,et al.  The Danube restoration project: functional aspects and planktonic productivity in the floodplain system , 1999 .

[37]  C. Amoros,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands. III. Vegetation survey and monitoring optimization , 1996 .

[38]  Habitat restoration along the River Rhine in the Netherlands: putting ideas into practice , 1998 .

[39]  Chris Marshall,et al.  Design guidelines , 1987 .

[40]  R. E. Grift.  How fish benefit from floodplain restoration along the lower River Rhine , 2001 .

[41]  R. Jongman.  Vegetation, river management and land use in the dutch rhine floodplains , 1992 .

[42]  P. Belleudy.  Restoring flow capacity in the Loire River bed , 2000 .

[43]  D. Rhine.  Dr. Rhine responds , 2000 .

[44]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[45]  C. Amoros.  The Concept of Habitat Diversity Between and Within Ecosystems Applied to River Side-Arm Restoration , 2001, Environmental management.

[46]  Christian Baumgartner,et al.  Restoration of floodplain rivers: The ‘Danube restoration project’ , 1999 .

[47]  David P. Braun,et al.  How much water does a river need , 1997 .

[48]  K. Schmidt.  A True-Blue Vision for the Danube , 2001, Science.

[49]  I. Schlosser,et al.  Stream Fish Ecology: A Landscape PerspectiveLand use, which influences the terrestrial-aquatic interface, can affect fish populations and their community dynamics , 1991 .

[50]  Thomas Hein,et al.  HYDROLOGICAL CONNECTIVITY AND FLOOD PULSES AS THE CENTRAL ASPECTS FOR THE INTEGRITY OF A RIVER-FLOODPLAIN SYSTEM , 1995 .

[51]  Klement Tockner,et al.  The Danube restoration project: species diversity patterns across connectivity gradients in the floodplain system , 1999 .

[52]  L. Toth,et al.  Conceptual Evaluation of Factors Potentially Affecting Restoration of Habitat Structure within the Channelized Kissimmee River Ecosystem , 1995 .

[53]  L. M. Svendsen,et al.  Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU‐LIFE demonstration project, III—channel morphology, hydrodynamics and transport of sediment and nutrients , 1998 .

[54]  John R. Jones,et al.  Flooding to Restore Connectivity of Regulated, Large-River Wetlands Natural and controlled flooding as complementary processes along the lower Missouri River , 1998 .

[55]  K. Tockner,et al.  The fauna of dynamic riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[56]  S. Schmutz,et al.  Re‐establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[57]  Andrew R.G. Large,et al.  Floodplain assessment for restoration and conservation: linking hydrogeomorphology and ecology , 1992 .

[58]  G. Klaassen,et al.  Secondary Channels: Opportunities for and Limitations of Habitat Restoration , 1994 .

[59]  C. P. Henry,et al.  Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: II. An example in a former channel of the Rhône River , 1995 .

[60]  Bas Pedroli,et al.  River restoration in European lowland river systems , 1998 .

[61]  K. Tockner,et al.  Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[62]  W. P. Cofino,et al.  Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development , 1997 .

[63]  C. Nilsson,et al.  Fragmentation and Flow Regulation of River Systems in the Northern Third of the World , 1994, Science.

[64]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Room for the Rhine branches in The Netherlands : what the research has taught us , 2001 .

[65]  Alexander S. Flecker,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in running waters , 1993 .

[66]  F. Schiemer.  Fish as indicators for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large rivers , 2000 .

[67]  Charles C. Coutant,et al.  A GENERAL PROTOCOL FOR RESTORATION OF REGULATED RIVERS , 1996 .

[68]  Classification of Danube Delta lakes based on aquatic vegetation and turbidity , 1999 .

[69]  A. D. Buijse,et al.  Effects of Hydrology and Water Quality on the Fish Communityin Danube Delta Lakes , 2002 .

[70]  P. Williams,et al.  Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU‐LIFE demonstration project, V—short‐term impacts on the conservation value of aquatic macroinvertebrate and macrophyte assemblages , 1998 .

[71]  F. Schiemer,et al.  Strategies for conservation of a Danubian fish fauna , 1992 .

[72]  Anthonie D. Buijse,et al.  Ecological gradients in the Danube Delta lakes: present state and man-induced changes , 2000 .

[73]  N. Holmes,et al.  Restoration of the rivers Brede, Cole and Skerne: a joint Danish and British EU-LIFE demonstration project, I—Setting up and delivery of the project , 1998 .

[74]  C. Bakker,et al.  Secondary channels as a basis for the ecological rehabilitation of Dutch rivers , 1998 .

[75]  J. Stanford,et al.  The serial discontinuity concept : extending the model to floodplain rivers , 1995 .

[76]  G. Bornette,et al.  Biodiversity in the floodplain of Saône: a global approach , 1999, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[77]  A. Lelek.  Threatened fishes of Europe , 1987 .

[78]  R. E. Grift,et al.  MAN-MADE SECONDARY CHANNELS ALONG THE RIVER RHINE (THE NETHERLANDS); RESULTS OF POST-PROJECT MONITORING , 2001 .

[79]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .