Progressive aphasia secondary to Alzheimer disease vs FTLD pathology

Background: The pathology causing progressive aphasia is typically a variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration, especially with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U). Less commonly the underlying pathology is Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective: To compare clinicopathologic and MRI features of subjects with progressive aphasia and AD pathology to subjects with aphasia and FTLD-U pathology and subjects with typical AD. Methods: We identified 5 subjects with aphasia and AD pathology and 5 with aphasia and FTLD-U pathology with an MRI from a total of 216 aphasia subjects. Ten subjects with typical AD clinical features and AD pathology were also identified. All subjects with AD pathology underwent pathologic reanalysis with TDP-43 immunohistochemistry. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to assess patterns of gray matter atrophy in the aphasia cases with AD pathology, aphasia cases with FTLD-U, and typical AD cases with AD pathology, compared with a normal control group. Results: All aphasic subjects had fluent speech output. However, those with AD pathology had better processing speed than those with FTLD-U pathology. Immunohistochemistry with TDP-43 antibodies was negative. VBM revealed gray matter atrophy predominantly in the temporoparietal cortices, with notable sparing of the hippocampus in the aphasia with AD subjects. In comparison, the aphasic subjects with FTLD-U showed sparing of the parietal lobe. Typical AD subjects showed temporoparietal and hippocampal atrophy. Conclusions: A temporoparietal pattern of atrophy on MRI in patients with progressive fluent aphasia and relatively preserved processing speed is suggestive of underlying Alzheimer disease pathology rather than frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-only immunoreactive changes. GLOSSARY: AD = Alzheimer disease; ADPR = Alzheimer's Disease Patient Registry; ADRC = Alzheimer's Disease Research Center; aphasia–AD = subjects with progressive aphasia and Alzheimer disease pathology; aphasia–FTLD-U = subjects with progressive aphasia and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-only immunoreactive changes pathology; CDR = Clinical Dementia Rating; DCT = discrete cosine transformation; FTLD = frontotemporal lobar degeneration; FTLD-U = frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-only immunoreactive changes; FWHM = full-width at half-maximum; GM = gray matter; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute; NA = not applicable; NIA = National Institute on Aging; NR = not reported; NS = not significant; PPA = primary progressive aphasia; typical AD = subjects with a clinical and pathologic diagnosis of Alzheimer disease; VBM = voxel-based morphometry; WAIS-R = Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised; WM = white matter; WMS-R = Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised.

[1]  Jennifer L. Whitwell,et al.  Clinicopathological and imaging correlates of progressive aphasia and apraxia of speech. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Editorial on Consensus Recommendations for the Postmortem Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer Disease , 1997, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[3]  N. Dronkers A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation , 1996, Nature.

[4]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[5]  M. Grossman,et al.  Sentence Comprehension in Alzheimer's Disease , 1998, Brain and Language.

[6]  E. Bigio,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease-type inclusions predominates in 76 cases of frontotemporal degeneration , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.

[7]  J. Carroll,et al.  A factor analysis of the Minnesota test for differential diagnosis of aphasia. , 1962, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[9]  Guy B. Williams,et al.  Progressive non-fluent aphasia is associated with hypometabolism centred on the left anterior insula. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Neuropsychological tests' norms above age 55: COWAT, BNT, MAE token, WRAT-R reading, AMNART, STROOP, TMT, and JLO , 1996 .

[12]  J. Gee,et al.  What's in a name: voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  M. Weiner,et al.  Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[14]  John Q. Trojanowski,et al.  Consensus Recommendations for the Postmortem Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease , 1997, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  M. Grossman,et al.  Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Review , 2004, Neurocase.

[16]  H J Testa,et al.  Progressive language disorder due to lobar atrophy , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[17]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  A voxel‐based morphometry study of semantic dementia: Relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[18]  E. Renzi,et al.  The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. , 1962, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  M. Mesulam Primary progressive aphasia pathology , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[20]  Bruce L. Miller,et al.  Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2006, Science.

[21]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  The evolution and pathology of frontotemporal dementia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Comparison of different methodological implementations of voxel-based morphometry in neurodegenerative disease , 2005, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Hodges,et al.  Clinicopathological correlates in frontotemporal dementia , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[24]  J. Baron,et al.  In Vivo Mapping of Gray Matter Loss with Voxel-Based Morphometry in Mild Alzheimer's Disease , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[26]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The Boston naming test , 2001 .

[27]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.

[28]  Andrew Kertesz,et al.  Primary progressive aphasia: Diagnosis, varieties, evolution , 2003, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[29]  K Patterson,et al.  Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  R. Reitan Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[31]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Cinguloparietal atrophy distinguishes Alzheimer disease from semantic dementia. , 2003, Archives of neurology.

[32]  R. Petersen,et al.  Antemortem diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[33]  M. Freedman,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 1998, Neurology.

[34]  M N Rossor,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and ubiquitin immunohistochemistry , 2004, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[35]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[36]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  The pathological basis of semantic dementia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  H. Braak,et al.  Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes , 2004, Acta Neuropathologica.