Deposition of foulant particles during tangential flow filtration

Abstract The fraction of foulant particles deposited on Anopore aluminum oxide microfiltration membranes during tangential flow filtration was measured by direct visual observation (DVO). Yeast cells and 4.5 μm, 10 μm, and 20 μm latex particles were used as model foulants. The fractional particle deposition was found to increase with increasing permeate flux and decrease with increasing wall shear rate. At a fixed permeate flux and wall shear rate, the fractional deposition decreased with increasing particle size, allowing for particle segregation by size. For feed suspensions at the isoelectric point of the membrane (pH 8), individual particles and cells were frequently observed rolling over the membrane surface. To better understand the observed fractional deposition and foulant rolling speed, a mathematical model of a sphere rolling over a rough, permeable surface due to viscous shear flow was developed. The primary parameter in the model is the dimensionless permeate flux, defined as the ratio of permeate flux (velocity of fluid flowing normal to the surface) to the characteristic shear velocity (velocity of fluid flowing tangentially over the surface at one particle radius above the surface). For a given permeate flux, a sphere will stick to the surface only when it encounters a roughness element taller than a critical height. The time-averaged translational velocities of particles rolling over the membrane surface were also calculated using the model and are in good agreement with experimental results, with values reduced by interactions with the membrane to typically 20–50% of the undisturbed tangential fluid velocity at one radius above the membrane.

[1]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Motion of a sphere down a rough plane in a viscous fluid , 2002 .

[2]  Cross-flow filtration , 1985 .

[3]  Feng-Chia Hsu,et al.  Steady-state permeate flux of cross-flow microfiltration , 1995 .

[4]  Greg Foley,et al.  Modelling the effects of particle polydispersity in crossflow filtration , 1995 .

[5]  H. Ebner Die kontinuierliche Mikrofiltration von Essig , 1981 .

[6]  P. Schmitz,et al.  Measurement of particle/membrane interactions by a hydrodynamic method , 1996 .

[7]  G. Davies,et al.  A theoretical study of transient cross-flow filtration using force balance analysis , 1995 .

[8]  Marc A. Deshusses,et al.  Direct observation of biofouling in cross-flow microfiltration: mechanisms of deposition and release , 2004 .

[9]  W. D. Mores,et al.  Direct visual observation of yeast deposition and removal during microfiltration , 2001 .

[10]  Douglas W. Fuerstenau,et al.  Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions , 1966 .

[11]  Chi Tien,et al.  A simple model of cross‐flow filtration based on particle adhesion , 1993 .

[12]  H. K. Vyas Cake resistance and force balance mechanism in the crossflow microfiltration of lactalbumin particles , 2001 .

[13]  O. Cavalleri,et al.  Surface characterization of ceramic membranes by atomic force microscopy , 1994 .

[14]  Siegfried Ripperger,et al.  Particle deposition and layer formation at the crossflow microfiltration , 1997 .

[15]  Wei-Ming Lu,et al.  Selective Particle Deposition in Crossflow Filtration , 1989 .

[16]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Particle Deposition onto a Permeable Surface in Laminar Flow , 1995 .

[17]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall—I Motion through a quiescent fluid , 1967 .

[18]  D. Leighton,et al.  Measurement of the hydrodynamic surface roughness of noncolloidal spheres , 1989 .

[19]  R. Field,et al.  Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling , 1995 .

[20]  I. W. Cumming,et al.  Prediction of steady state crossflow filtration using a force balance model , 1992 .

[21]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Theoretical descriptions of membrane filtration of colloids and fine particles: An assessment and review , 1995 .

[22]  Gun Trägårdh,et al.  The influence of the membrane zeta potential on the critical flux for crossflow microfiltration of particle suspensions , 1999 .

[23]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall , 1967 .

[24]  D. Chang,et al.  Steady State permeat flux for particle cross-flow filtration , 1996 .

[25]  S. Goren The hydrodynamic force resisting the approach of a sphere to a plane permeable wall , 1979 .

[26]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  A Bernis,et al.  Study of filter cake formation mechanisms during tangential filtration of dust-laden gases at high temperature , 2000 .

[28]  S. Chellam,et al.  Particle transport in clean membrane filters in laminar flow , 1992 .

[29]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Time-averaged hydrodynamic roughness of a noncolloidal sphere in low Reynolds number motion down an inclined plane , 2001 .

[30]  F. René,et al.  A cross-flow microfiltration model based on integration of the mass transport equation , 1995 .

[31]  Hans G.L. Coster,et al.  Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration , 1998 .