Impact of Ki67 re-assessment at time of disease progression in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Background Although re-assessment of proliferative activity by K67 evaluation during the course of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is recommended in selected patients, its impact on patients’ management is not clear due to the lack of data supporting this practice. Aim To investigate Ki67 change at time of progressive disease (PD) in entero-pancreatic NENs (EP-NENs). Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of sporadic EP-NENs which received histological re-assessment after PD once radiologically documented. Results Forty-three patients were evaluated, including 24 pancreatic NENs (PNENs), and 19 small intestine NENs (SI-NENs). At time of initial histological evaluation, 19 patients had grade 1 (G1) NETs (44.2%), and 24 grade 2 (G2) NETs (55.8%), overall median Ki67 being 3% (range 1%-20%). At time of PD, 13 patients had G1 NETs (30.2%), 26 G2 NETs (60.5%), and 4 had grade 3 (G3) NECs (9.3%), thus resulting in a significant median Ki67 increase (8%, range 1%-70%; p = 0.0006), and a G upgrading in 12 patients (27.9%). A statistically significant Ki67 increase and G grading change at time of PD was observed in PNENs (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.028, respectively). Conversely, no statistically significant change occurred in non-PNENs. Conclusions In PNENs with documented PD, Ki67 increase occurs in a significant proportion of patients, providing useful information necessary to choose appropriate therapeutic options.

[1]  P. Ruszniewski,et al.  Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement. , 2016, The oncologist.

[2]  E. Krenning,et al.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Distant Metastatic Disease of Intestinal, Pancreatic, Bronchial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (NEN) and NEN of Unknown Primary Site , 2016, Neuroendocrinology.

[3]  R. Fiocca,et al.  Grade Increases in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Metastases Compared to the Primary Tumor , 2015, Neuroendocrinology.

[4]  C. Rowsell,et al.  Variability of Ki67 labeling index in multiple neuroendocrine tumors specimens over the course of the disease. , 2014, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  I. Adalet,et al.  Can Complementary 68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT Establish the Missing Link Between Histopathology and Therapeutic Approach in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  R. Goldin,et al.  Role of Ki-67 Proliferation Index in the Assessment of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasias Regarding the Stage of Disease , 2014, World Journal of Surgery.

[7]  K. Öberg,et al.  Neuroendocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic tumors: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  A. Scarpa,et al.  TNM staging of neoplasms of the endocrine pancreas: results from a large international cohort study. , 2012, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  F. D. De Braud,et al.  Risk Factors for Disease Progression in Advanced Jejunoileal Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2011, Neuroendocrinology.

[10]  A. Scarpa,et al.  Metastatic and locally advanced pancreatic endocrine carcinomas: analysis of factors associated with disease progression. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  G. delle Fave,et al.  Gastroenteropancreatic (neuro)endocrine neoplasms: the histology report. , 2011, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[12]  S. Willich,et al.  Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors , 2008, Cancer.

[13]  M. Falconi,et al.  Prognostic factors and survival in endocrine tumor patients: comparison between gastrointestinal and pancreatic localization. , 2005, Endocrine-related cancer.

[14]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  I. Adalet,et al.  Can Complementary 68 Ga-DOTATATE and 18 F-FDG PET/CT Establish the Missing Link Between Histopathology and Therapeutic Approach in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors? , 2014 .

[16]  R. Schilsky,et al.  Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  J. A. Sulbarán Muñoz,et al.  [Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system]. , 1990, G.E.N.