Extracting Decisions from Multi-Party Dialogue Using Directed Graphical Models and Semantic Similarity

We use directed graphical models (DGMs) to automatically detect decision discussions in multi-party dialogue. Our approach distinguishes between different dialogue act (DA) types based on their role in the formulation of a decision. DGMs enable us to model dependencies, including sequential ones. We summarize decisions by extracting suitable phrases from DAs that concern the issue under discussion and its resolution. Here we use a semantic-similarity metric to improve results on both manual and ASR transcripts.

[1]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  GEMINI: A Natural Language System for Spoken-Language Understanding , 1993, ACL.

[2]  Andreas Stolcke,et al.  The ICSI Meeting Project: Resources and Research , 2004 .

[3]  Klaus Zechner,et al.  Automatic Summarization of Open-Domain Multiparty Dialogues in Diverse Genres , 2002, CL.

[4]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Identifying relevant phrases to summarize decisions in spoken meetings , 2008, INTERSPEECH.

[5]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Detecting group interest-level in meetings , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[6]  Jean Carletta,et al.  The AMI meeting corpus , 2005 .

[7]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Detecting and Summarizing Action Items in Multi-Party Dialogue , 2007, SIGDIAL.

[8]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Analysing Meeting Records: An Ethnographic Study and Technological Implications , 2005, MLMI.

[9]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Combining Local Context and Wordnet Similarity for Word Sense Identification , 1998 .

[10]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Making large scale SVM learning practical , 1998 .

[11]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Automatic Decision Detection in Meeting Speech , 2007, MLMI.

[12]  Dirk Heylen,et al.  First Steps Towards the Automatic Construction of Argument-Diagrams from Real Discussions , 2006, COMMA.

[13]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  The Necessity of a Meeting Recording and Playback System, and the Benefit of Topic-Level Annotations to Meeting Browsing , 2005, INTERACT.

[14]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  Identifying Agreement and Disagreement in Conversational Speech: Use of Bayesian Networks to Model Pragmatic Dependencies , 2004, ACL.

[15]  Stanley Peters,et al.  Modelling and Detecting Decisions in Multi-party Dialogue , 2008, SIGDIAL Workshop.

[16]  Stuart J. Russell,et al.  Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning , 2002 .

[17]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  Dialog act tagging using graphical models , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..