Safety in the Context of Coordination via Adjustable Autonomy

When large heterogeneous robot and agent teams operate in the real-world, it is essential that a human operator has overall control to ensure safety. However, giving an operator the required control is difficult due to the complexity of the activities such teams engage in and the infeasibility of simply stopping the team whenever human input is required. Our approach to interaction in such a context has three key components which allow us to leverage human expertise by giving them responsibility for key coordination decisions, without risks to the coordination due to slow responses. First, to deal with the dynamic nature of the situation, we use pre-planned sequences of transfer of control actions called transfer-of-control strategies. Second, to allow identification of key coordination issues in a distributed way, individual coordination tasks are explicitly represented as coordination roles, rather than being implicitly represented within a monolithic protocol. Such a representation allows meta-reasoning about those roles to determine when human input may be useful. Third, the meta-reasoning and transfer-of-control strategies are encapsulated in a mobile agent that moves around the group to either get human input or autonomously make a decision. In this paper, we describe this approach and present initial results from interaction between a large number of UAVs and a small number of humans.

[1]  Richard M. Clark Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles: Airpower by the People, for the People, but Not With the People , 2000 .

[2]  James F. Allen,et al.  TRAINS-95: Towards a Mixed-Initiative Planning Assistant , 1996, AIPS.

[3]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  Teamwork in Cyberspace: Using TEAMCORE to Make Agents Team-Ready , 1999 .

[4]  J. Stone Air University Press , 2010 .

[5]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Multiagent teamwork: analyzing the optimality and complexity of key theories and models , 2002, AAMAS '02.

[6]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Role allocation and reallocation in multiagent teams: towards a practical analysis , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[7]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Agent Architectures for Flexible, Practical Teamwork , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[8]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  An Asynchronous Complete Method for General Distributed Constraint Optimization , 2002 .

[9]  Alice M. Mulvehill,et al.  Rationale-Supported Mixed-Initiative Case-Based Planning , 1997, AAAI/IAAI.

[10]  Mark H. Burstein,et al.  A Framework for Dynamic Information Flow in Mixed-Initiative Human/Agent Organizations , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[11]  Robert Nesbit,et al.  Defense Science Board Study on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles , 2004 .

[12]  John L. Pollock,et al.  The Logical Foundations of Goal-Regression Planning in Autonomous Agents , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[13]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Advanced Interfaces for Vehicle Teleoperation: Collaborative Control, Sensor Fusion Displays, and Web-based Tools , 2000 .

[14]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  An asynchronous complete method for distributed constraint optimization , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[15]  Milind Tambe,et al.  A prototype infrastructure for distributed robot-agent-person teams , 2003, AAMAS '03.

[16]  John Stillion,et al.  Aerospace Operations Against Elusive Ground Targets , 2001 .

[17]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  RoboCup Rescue: search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[18]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  User Interaction with Multi-Robot Systems , 2002 .

[19]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Toward Team-Oriented Programming , 1999, ATAL.

[20]  Scott A. DeLoach,et al.  Design Issues for Mixed-Initiative Agent Systems , 1999 .

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  The archon systems and its applications , 1995 .

[22]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Adjustable Autonomy for the Real World , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[23]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Experiments in adjustable autonomy , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[24]  Lynne E. Parker,et al.  Multi-Robot Systems: From Swarms to Intelligent Automata , 2002, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  Anthony Stentz,et al.  Market-Based Multi-Robot Planning in a Distributed Layered Architecture , 2003 .