Incremental Specification Validation and Runtime Adaptivity of Distributed Component Information systems

Despite all colossal efforts and investments by information systems (IS) practitioners and researchers, today's IS still remain far from timely exhibiting the required levels of adaptivity dictated by highly volatile, competitive and inter-organizational ('socio-techno-business') distributed environment. Difficulties in approaching dynamic adaptivity in IS remain essentially on how promoting manageability (e.g. simplicity/understandability/incrementality) without compromising correctness and distribution. Recapitulating from the wide acceptance and understandability of UML diagrammatical artifacts and the rigorous and distributed capabilities of component-based formalisms, we propose a stepwise approach for developing evolving distributed IS. Staring from UML-OCL descriptions, we smoothly shift them towards a tailored component Petri nets variant we called Co-NETS, where validation is geared by true-concurrent symbolic computations using rewriting logic. Applying ideas from recent AOP techniques, we then incrementally cope with behavioral dynamic changes by conceiving on top of each Co-NETS component and/or coordination a Petri net-based evolutionary aspect-layer and endow it with sound yet simple runtime weaving mechanisms

[1]  Bran Selic,et al.  Using UML for Modeling Complex Real-Time Systems , 1998, LCTES.

[2]  Bernhard Rumpe,et al.  «UML»’99 — The Unified Modeling Language , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Nasreddine Aoumeur Specifying and validating consistent and dynamically evolving concurrent information systems: an object Petri net based approach , 2002 .

[4]  Cláudio Sant'Anna,et al.  Reflections on architectural connection: seven issues on aspects and ADLs , 2006, EA '06.

[5]  Walter Cazzola,et al.  SmartMethod: an efficient replacement for method , 2004, SAC '04.

[6]  Michel Wermelinger,et al.  Superposing connectors , 2000, Tenth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design. IWSSD-10 2000.

[7]  José Meseguer,et al.  Conditioned Rewriting Logic as a United Model of Concurrency , 1992, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Pericles Loucopoulos,et al.  Relating evolving business rules to software design , 2004, J. Syst. Archit..

[9]  Mary Shaw,et al.  Software architecture - perspectives on an emerging discipline , 1996 .

[10]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[11]  David Garlan,et al.  A formal basis for architectural connection , 1997, TSEM.

[12]  하수철,et al.  [서평]「Component Software」 - Beyond Object-Oriented Programming - , 2000 .

[13]  David Garlan,et al.  Mapping Architectural Concepts to UML-RT , 2001 .

[14]  Mike P. Papazoglou,et al.  Cooperative Information Systems: Trends and Directions , 1997 .

[15]  Florian Matthes,et al.  Modeling Dynamic Software Components with UML , 1999, UML.

[16]  Sarah J Parsons,et al.  Guest Editors , 2012, Oncogene.

[17]  Gunter Saake,et al.  A component-based Petri net model for specifying and validating cooperative information systems , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[18]  Jim Dowling,et al.  The K-Component Architecture Meta-model for Self-Adaptive Software , 2001, Reflection.

[19]  Bart Jacobs,et al.  Reasonong about Classess in Object-Oriented Languages: Logical Models and Tools , 1998, ESOP.

[20]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  The temporal logic of actions , 1994, TOPL.

[21]  Satoshi Matsuoka,et al.  Metalevel Architectures and Separation of Crosscutting Concerns , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.