Left atrial model reconstruction in atrial fibrillation ablation: reliability of new mapping and complex impedance systems

Aims The effectiveness of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation relies on detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the left atrium (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs). It is common to combine computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) with imaging by electroanatomical (EA) mapping systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of LA anatomical reconstruction by 'One Model' and 'VeriSense' tools (Ensite Velocity 3.0, St Jude Medical), compared with CT/MR imaging. Methods and results Seventy-two patients with AF underwent pre-procedural imaging (97% CT-scan, 3% MR imaging) and transcatheter ablation of PVs. Operators were blinded to CT/MR imaging. Electrical Coupling Index (ECI) was used to recognize venous structures when the circular catheter could not. The LA 'One Model' map was obtained without complications; all 124 main left PVs and 144 main right PVs were detected. Nine of 9 intermediate right PVs and 30 of 30 early branches were detected, whereas 1 of the 27 early branches on the right inferior PVs was missed. Comparison between LA intervein distances measured on the roof (RO) and the posterior wall (PW) showed a high correspondence between the EA model and CT/MR imaging (RO CT/MR imaging vs. EA: 32 ± 7 vs. 32 ± 7 mm; PW CT/MR imaging vs. EA: 36 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 7 mm). The EA model yielded slightly larger PV ostia diameters, owing to the distortion caused by catheter pressure. Conclusions Recent 3D mapping tools allow outstanding anatomical rendering and are key in complex ablation procedure set-up. This study shows that 3D anatomical reconstruction of LA, PVs, and their variable branches is not only safe and fast but also accurate and reliable.

[1]  P. Moriña-Vázquez,et al.  Exclusion of Fluoroscopy Use in Catheter Ablation Procedures: Six Years of Experience at a Single Center , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Catheter Guidance Technology in Electrophysiology Procedures , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  Y. Okumura,et al.  Effect of Catheter Tip‐Tissue Surface Contact on Three‐Dimensional Left Atrial and Pulmonary Vein Geometries: Potential Anatomic Distortion of 3D Ultrasound, Fast Anatomical Mapping, and Merged 3D CT‐Derived Images , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  J. Saul,et al.  Update on rhythm mapping and catheter navigation , 2011, Current opinion in cardiology.

[5]  E. Wellnhofer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for characterization of pulmonary vein morphology before radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Hans-Joachim Nesser,et al.  Impact of Integration of Multislice Computed Tomography Imaging into Three‐Dimensional Electroanatomic Mapping on Clinical Outcomes, Safety, and Efficacy Using Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  T. Dickfeld,et al.  Image integration in electroanatomic mapping , 2007, Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie.

[8]  R. Schilling,et al.  Image integration for atrial fibrillation ablation--pearls and pitfalls. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[9]  Kim Rajappan,et al.  The Impact of CT Image Integration into an Electroanatomic Mapping System on Clinical Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  R. Schilling,et al.  Validation of Three‐Dimensional Cardiac Image Integration: Use of Integrated CT Image into Electroanatomic Mapping System to Perform Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  PhD J. Dong MD,et al.  Image integration in electroanatomic mapping , 2007, Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie.