The Drivers of Technology Licensing: An Industry Comparison

In the past, most industrial firms focused on applying technology assets in their own products and services. Along with the trend towards open innovation, however, many firms have recently started to actively license out technology. These firms consider technology licensing a strategic activity, which may include all technology assets and which goes far beyond a marginal activity of commercializing residual technologies. The research collected for this articles shows that the strategic drivers of technology licensing are often more important than generating licensing revenues. The strategic drivers strengthen the interdependences between internally and externally commercializing technology. Product marketing and licensing are complements rather than substitutes in technology exploitation.

[1]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .

[2]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Developing reputation to overcome the imperfections in the markets for knowledge , 2007 .

[3]  Sadao Nagaoka,et al.  The incidence of cross-licensing: A theory and new evidence on the firm and contract level determinants , 2006 .

[4]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Attitudes to Externally Organising Knowledge Management Tasks: A Review, Reconsideration and Extension of the NIH Syndrome , 2006 .

[5]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[6]  Andrea Fosfuri.  The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .

[7]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[8]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[9]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  External Commercialization of Knowledge: Review and Research Agenda , 2005 .

[10]  T. Costello,et al.  Defining Property Rights: The Case of Knowledge-Based Resources , 2005 .

[11]  Deli Yang,et al.  Intellectual Property Abuses: How should Multinationals Respond? , 2004 .

[12]  M. Reitzig.  Strategic Management of Intellectual Property , 2004 .

[13]  Paul Germeraad,et al.  Measuring R&D in 2003 , 2003 .

[14]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[15]  David Kline,et al.  Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels , 2003 .

[16]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2002 .

[17]  Julie L Davis,et al.  Edison in the Boardroom: How Leading Companies Realize Value from Their Intellectual Assets , 2001 .

[18]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis,et al.  The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the U , 2001 .

[19]  S. Koruna,et al.  External technology commercialization: policy guidelines , 2001, PICMET '01. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol.1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37199).

[20]  David Kline,et al.  Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents , 1999 .

[21]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Industrial research as a source of important patents , 1998 .

[22]  D. Teece.  Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets , 1998 .

[23]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[24]  D. Teece,et al.  Managing Intellectual Capital: Licensing and Cross-Licensing in Semiconductors and Electronics , 1997 .

[25]  A. Arora.  PATENTS, LICENSING, AND MARKET STRUCTURE IN THE CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1996 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[27]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[28]  M. Porter.  TECHNOLOGY AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 1985 .

[29]  J. Goodnow.  International Technology Licensing: Compensation, Costs and Negotiation , 1982 .

[30]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .