Physical constraints in cell fate specification. A case in point: Microgravity and phenotypes differentiation.

Data obtained by studying mammalian cells in absence of gravity strongly support the notion that cell fate specification cannot be understood according to the current molecular model. A paradigmatic case in point is provided by studying cell populations growing in absence of gravity. When the physical constraint (gravity) is 'experimentally removed', cells spontaneously allocate into two morphologically different phenotypes. Such phenomenon is likely enacted by the intrinsic stochasticity, which, in turn, is successively 'canalized' by a specific gene regulatory network. Both phenotypes are thermodynamically and functionally 'compatibles' with the new, modified environment. However, when the two cell subsets are reseeded into the 1g gravity field the two phenotypes collapse into one. Gravity constraints the system in adopting only one phenotype, not by selecting a pre-existing configuration, but more precisely shaping it de-novo through the modification of the cytoskeleton three-dimensional structure. Overall, those findings highlight how macro-scale features are irreducible to lower-scale explanations. The identification of macroscale control parameters - as those depending on the field (gravity, electromagnetic fields) or emerging from the cooperativity among the field's components (tissue stiffness, cell-to-cell connectivity) - are mandatory for assessing boundary conditions for models at lower scales, thus providing a concrete instantiation of top-down effects.

[1]  Joachim Kohn,et al.  Cytoskeleton-based forecasting of stem cell lineage fates , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Forcing stem cells to behave: a biophysical perspective of the cellular microenvironment. , 2012, Annual review of biophysics.

[3]  D. Bohm,et al.  Wholeness and the Implicate Order , 1981 .

[4]  Peter Hänggi,et al.  Bistable systems: Master equation versus Fokker-Planck modeling , 1984 .

[5]  I. Prigogine,et al.  Symmetry breaking and pattern selection in far-from-equilibrium systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  T. Hwa,et al.  Growth Rate-Dependent Global Effects on Gene Expression in Bacteria , 2009, Cell.

[7]  J. Ferrell,et al.  A positive-feedback-based bistable ‘memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision , 2003, Nature.

[8]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[9]  Gravity detection through bifurcation. , 1992, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[10]  A Romano,et al.  Analysis of a "phase transition" from tumor growth to latency. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[11]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Adaptive Response of a Gene Network to Environmental Changes by Fitness-Induced Attractor Selection , 2006, PloS one.

[12]  Sara Green,et al.  Biology meets physics: Reductionism and multi-scale modeling of morphogenesis. , 2017, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[13]  M. Braun,et al.  Alterations of the cytoskeleton in human cells in space proved by life-cell imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  M. Denton,et al.  Laws of form revisited , 2001, Nature.

[15]  C. Waddington The strategy of the genes , 1957 .

[16]  Jean-Jacques Kupiec,et al.  The Origin of Individuals , 2009 .

[17]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Set9, a novel histone H3 methyltransferase that facilitates transcription by precluding histone tail modifications required for heterochromatin formation. , 2002, Genes & development.

[18]  Andrew Wuensche,et al.  Biased Eukaryotic Gene Regulation Rules Suggest Genome Behavior Is Near Edge of Chaos , 1997 .

[19]  Stéphanie Portet,et al.  Models of spatial and orientational self-organization of microtubules under the influence of gravitational fields. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Physical forces and non linear dynamics mould fractal cell shape: quantitative morphological parameters and cell phenotype. , 2013, Histology and histopathology.

[21]  C. Peterson,et al.  Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[22]  Youngsin Park,et al.  Cell reprogramming into the pluripotent state using graphene based substrates. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[23]  Todd C McDevitt,et al.  Engineering the embryoid body microenvironment to direct embryonic stem cell differentiation , 2009, Biotechnology progress.

[24]  S. M. Grenon,et al.  Effects of Gravitational Mechanical Unloading in Endothelial Cells: Association between Caveolins, Inflammation and Adhesion Molecules , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[25]  P. Tracqui,et al.  Biophysical models of tumour growth , 2009 .

[26]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. , 2005, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  G. Longo,et al.  Perspectives on Organisms , 2014, Lecture Notes in Morphogenesis.

[28]  D. Grimm,et al.  Moderate alterations of the cytoskeleton in human chondrocytes after short‐term microgravity produced by parabolic flight maneuvers could be prevented by up‐regulation of BMP‐2 and SOX‐9 , 2015, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[29]  P. Lelkes,et al.  Growing tissues in microgravity , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[30]  Amy Brock,et al.  Non-Darwinian dynamics in therapy-induced cancer drug resistance , 2013, Nature Communications.

[31]  Giuseppe Longo,et al.  Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , 2012 .

[32]  A. M. Arias,et al.  Transition states and cell fate decisions in epigenetic landscapes , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[33]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[34]  L. Morbidelli,et al.  Effect of Hypergravity on Endothelial Cell Function and Gene Expression , 2009 .

[35]  Kathrin Plath,et al.  Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[37]  Ruth K. Globus,et al.  Microgravity Reduces the Differentiation and Regenerative Potential of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2015, Stem cells and development.

[38]  Michael Levin,et al.  Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: Non-local control of complex patterning , 2012, Biosyst..

[39]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Phenotypic Switch Induced by Simulated Microgravity on MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells , 2014, BioMed research international.

[40]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Multistable and multistep dynamics in neutrophil differentiation , 2006, BMC Cell Biology.

[41]  Howard Hunt Pattee,et al.  The Physical Basis and Origin of Hierarchical Control , 2012 .

[42]  G. McArthur,et al.  Lineage-restricted recruitment of immature hematopoietic progenitor cells in response to Epo after normal hematopoietic cell transfection with EpoR. , 1995, Experimental Hematology.

[43]  Qing Luo,et al.  Microgravity directs stem cell differentiation. , 2017, Histology and histopathology.

[44]  A. Páldi What makes the cell differentiate? , 2012, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[45]  J. Folkman,et al.  Role of cell shape in growth control , 1978, Nature.

[46]  G. McArthur,et al.  Induced expression of c-fms in normal hematopoietic cells shows evidence for both conservation and lineage restriction of signal transduction in response to macrophage colony-stimulating factor. , 1994, Blood.

[47]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[48]  Gabriel S. Eichler,et al.  Cell fates as high-dimensional attractor states of a complex gene regulatory network. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[49]  Fabian J Theis,et al.  Prospective identification of hematopoietic lineage choice by deep learning , 2017, Nature Methods.

[50]  D. Wilkinson Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Fractal analysis of shape changes in murine osteoblasts cultured under simulated microgravity , 2014, Rendiconti Lincei.

[52]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Microenvironment Promotes Tumor Cell Reprogramming in Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines , 2013, PloS one.

[53]  D. Grimm,et al.  Growing tissues in real and simulated microgravity: new methods for tissue engineering. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[54]  B. Goodwin,et al.  The life of form. Emergent patterns of morphological transformation. , 2000, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[55]  Elhanan Borenstein,et al.  An End to Endless Forms: Epistasis, Phenotype Distribution Bias, and Nonuniform Evolution , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  J. McDonald,et al.  Osteoblast and Osteoclast Differentiation in Modeled Microgravity , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Jacob G Foster,et al.  A model of sequential branching in hierarchical cell fate determination. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[58]  L. Griffith,et al.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[59]  K. Miyamoto,et al.  Regulation of osteogenetic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by two axial rotational culture , 2011, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[60]  P. M. Gershovich,et al.  Cytoskeletal proteins and stem cell markers gene expression in human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells after different periods of simulated microgravity , 2012 .

[61]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Single-Cell-Based Analysis Highlights a Surge in Cell-to-Cell Molecular Variability Preceding Irreversible Commitment in a Differentiation Process , 2016, PLoS biology.

[62]  W. Peltier,et al.  Deterministic chaos in the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction: Experiments and simulations. , 1993, Chaos.

[63]  D. Radisky,et al.  Regulation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Breast Cancer Cells by Cell Contact and Adhesion , 2015, Cancer informatics.

[64]  S. Kauffman Homeostasis and Differentiation in Random Genetic Control Networks , 1969, Nature.

[65]  Shamik Sen,et al.  Extracellular matrix density promotes EMT by weakening cell-cell adhesions. , 2014, Molecular bioSystems.

[66]  D. Ingber Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. , 1997, Annual review of physiology.

[67]  T. Enver,et al.  Do stem cells play dice? , 1998, Blood.

[68]  R. Chen,et al.  Effects of hindlimb unloading on ex vivo growth and osteogenic/adipogenic potentials of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in rats. , 2008, Stem cells and development.

[69]  D. Ingber,et al.  How cells (might) sense microgravity , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[70]  Z. Dai,et al.  Simulated microgravity inhibits the proliferation and osteogenesis of rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells , 2007, Cell proliferation.

[71]  Daniele Santoni,et al.  Modules Identification in Protein Structures: The Topological and Geometrical Solutions , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[72]  J. Tabony,et al.  Microtubule self-organization is gravity-dependent. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Beyond self-assembly: From microtubules to morphogenesis , 1986, Cell.

[74]  F. Guilak,et al.  Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[75]  E. Ben-Jacob,et al.  Tristability in cancer-associated microRNA-TF chimera toggle switch. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[76]  G. Longo,et al.  Theoretical principles for biology: Organization. , 2016, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[77]  I. Vernos,et al.  Microgravity effects on the oogenesis and development of embryos of Drosophila melanogaster laid in the Spaceshuttle during the Biorack experiment (ESA). , 1989, The International journal of developmental biology.

[78]  Masa Tsuchiya,et al.  Local and global responses in complex gene regulation networks , 2009 .

[79]  Denis Noble,et al.  A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation , 2012, Interface Focus.

[80]  Hulin Wu,et al.  Sparse Additive Ordinary Differential Equations for Dynamic Gene Regulatory Network Modeling , 2014, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[81]  G. Rose,et al.  The Levinthal paradox of the interactome , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[82]  A. Páldi,et al.  Bistable Cell Fate Specification as a Result of Stochastic Fluctuations and Collective Spatial Cell Behaviour , 2010, PloS one.

[83]  Robert Rosen,et al.  Essays on Life Itself , 1999 .

[84]  R. Mancini,et al.  Lung Cancer Stem Cell Lose Their Stemness Default State after Exposure to Microgravity , 2014, BioMed research international.

[85]  Cliff Hooker,et al.  On the Import of Constraints in Complex Dynamical Systems , 2012, Foundations of Science.

[86]  W. Roos,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton in sensing changes in gravity by nonspecialized cells , 2014, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[87]  L. Zon,et al.  Hematopoiesis: An Evolving Paradigm for Stem Cell Biology , 2008, Cell.

[88]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[89]  Non-genetic adaptive dynamics for cellular robustness , 2013, Front. Genet..

[90]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Cell Fate Decision as High-Dimensional Critical State Transition , 2016, bioRxiv.

[91]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Gravity sensing by cells: mechanisms and theoretical grounds , 2014, Rendiconti Lincei.

[92]  Guy S. Salvesen,et al.  SnapShot: Caspases , 2011, Cell.

[93]  G. Longo,et al.  From physics to biology by extending criticality and symmetry breakings. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[94]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[95]  Giuseppe Longo,et al.  No entailing laws, but enablement in the evolution of the biosphere , 2012, GECCO '12.

[96]  M. Mossio,et al.  Biological organisation as closure of constraints. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[97]  Cui Zhang,et al.  Behavior of stem cells under outer‐space microgravity and ground‐based microgravity simulation , 2015, Cell biology international.

[98]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Nonequilibrium Mechanics of Active Cytoskeletal Networks , 2007, Science.

[99]  I. Prigogine,et al.  Book Review: Modern Thermodynamics: From Heat Engines to Dissipative Structures , 1998 .

[100]  Hannah H. Chang,et al.  Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells , 2008, Nature.

[101]  K. Tobita,et al.  Directed Stem Cell Differentiation: The Role of Physical Forces , 2010, Cell communication & adhesion.

[102]  A. Páldi,et al.  Epigenetic gene expression noise and phenotypic diversification of clonal cell populations. , 2008, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[103]  L. Robb,et al.  Cytokine receptors and hematopoietic differentiation , 2007, Oncogene.

[104]  Jessica A. Bolker,et al.  Modularity in Development and Why It Matters to Evo-Devo1 , 2000 .

[105]  I. Prigogine,et al.  Sensitivity of nonequilibrium systems , 1981 .

[106]  H. Rubin Degrees and kinds of selection in spontaneous neoplastic transformation: an operational analysis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[107]  Christie M. Orschell,et al.  Impact of modeled microgravity on migration, differentiation, and cell cycle control of primitive human hematopoietic progenitor cells. , 2004, Experimental hematology.

[108]  Denis Noble,et al.  Biophysics and systems biology , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[109]  A. Grafen The formal darwinism project in outline , 2014 .

[110]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation , 2009, Nature.

[111]  D. Schaffer,et al.  Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming. , 2013, Nature materials.

[112]  D'arcy W. Thompson On Growth and Form , 1945 .

[113]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[114]  Philipp S. Hoppe,et al.  Hematopoietic Cytokines Can Instruct Lineage Choice , 2009, Science.

[115]  M. Bizzarri,et al.  Simulated microgravity triggers epithelial mesenchymal transition in human keratinocytes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[116]  K P Lee,et al.  Effect of spaceflight on human stem cell hematopoiesis: suppression of erythropoiesis and myelopoiesis , 1996, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[117]  Lina A. Thoren,et al.  Identification of Flt3+ Lympho-Myeloid Stem Cells Lacking Erythro-Megakaryocytic Potential A Revised Road Map for Adult Blood Lineage Commitment , 2005, Cell.

[118]  J. Tabony Morphological bifurcations involving reaction-diffusion processes during microtubule formation. , 1994, Science.

[119]  D. Patel,et al.  Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF , 2006, Nature.

[120]  R. Solé,et al.  Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks I. Emergence of patterns and genotype‐phenotype relationships , 2001, Evolution & development.

[121]  B. Boyan,et al.  Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids under microgravity conditions , 2012, Cell Regeneration.

[122]  Statistical Mechanics Of Chain Molecules , 1970 .

[123]  G. Stein,et al.  Implications for interrelationships between nuclear architecture and control of gene expression under microgravity conditions , 1999, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[124]  E. Pollard,et al.  Theoretical studies on living systems in the absence of mechanical stress. , 1965, Journal of theoretical biology.

[125]  G. Longo How Future Depends on Past and Rare Events in Systems of Life , 2017, Foundations of Science.

[126]  Giuseppe Longo,et al.  The Unconventionality of Nature: Biology, from Noise to Functional Randomness , 2015, UCNC.

[127]  Ana M Soto,et al.  Neoplasia as development gone awry: the role of endocrine disruptors. , 2008, International journal of andrology.

[128]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[129]  T. Maniatis,et al.  Regulation of inducible and tissue-specific gene expression. , 1987, Science.

[130]  E. Braun,et al.  Population Dynamics of Metastable Growth-Rate Phenotypes , 2013, PloS one.

[131]  Sui Huang Reprogramming cell fates: reconciling rarity with robustness , 2009, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[132]  K. Baverstock A comparison of two cell regulatory models entailing high dimensional attractors representing phenotype. , 2011, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[133]  Adrian Neagu,et al.  Role of physical mechanisms in biological self-organization. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[134]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. , 2004, Developmental cell.