Impact of Inter- and Intra-Donor Variability by Age on the Gel-to-Tissue Transition in MMP-Sensitive PEG Hydrogels for Cartilage Regeneration.

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-sensitive hydrogels are promising for cartilage tissue engineering due to cell-mediated control over hydrogel degradation. However, any variability in MMP, tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinase (TIMP), and/or extracellular matrix (ECM) production among donors will impact neotissue formation in the hydrogels. The goal for this study was to investigate the impact of inter- and intra-donor variability on the hydrogel-to-tissue transition. Transforming growth factor β3 was tethered into the hydrogel to maintain the chondrogenic phenotype and support neocartilage production, allowing the use of chemically defined medium. Bovine chondrocytes were isolated from two donor groups, skeletally immature juvenile and skeletally mature adult donors (inter-donor variability) and three donors within each group (intra-donor group variability). While the hydrogel supported neocartilaginous growth by all donors, donor age impacted MMP, TIMP, and ECM synthesis rates. Of the MMPs and TIMPs studied, MMP-1 and TIMP-1 were the most abundantly produced by all donors. Adult chondrocytes secreted higher levels of MMPs, which was accompanied by higher production of TIMPs. Juvenile chondrocytes exhibited more rapid ECM growth. By day 29, juvenile chondrocytes had surpassed the gel-to-tissue transition. On the contrary, the adult donors had a percolated polymer network indicating that despite higher levels of MMPs the gel-to-transition had not yet been achieved. The intra-donor group variability of MMP, TIMP, and ECM production was higher in adult chondrocytes but did not impact the extent of the gel-to-tissue transition. In summary, age-dependent inter-donor variations in MMPs and TIMPs significantly impact the timing of the gel-to-tissue transition in MMP-sensitive hydrogels.

[1]  Jerry C. Hu,et al.  The effect of neonatal, juvenile, and adult donors on rejuvenated neocartilage functional properties. , 2021, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[2]  S. Bryant,et al.  Mechanics of 3D Cell-Hydrogel Interactions: Experiments, Models, and Mechanisms. , 2021, Chemical reviews.

[3]  K. Hansen,et al.  Evaluation and Refinement of Sample Preparation Methods for Extracellular Matrix Proteome Coverage , 2020, bioRxiv.

[4]  Wenxin Wang,et al.  Cartilage-Derived Progenitor Cell-Laden Injectable Hydrogel-An Approach for Cartilage Tissue Regeneration. , 2020, ACS applied bio materials.

[5]  M. King,et al.  Biodegradable Polymers as the Pivotal Player in the Design of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds , 2020, Advanced healthcare materials.

[6]  J. Saklatvala,et al.  The Effects of Age and Cell Isolation on Collagen II Synthesis by Articular Chondrocytes: Evidence for Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Regulation , 2020, BioMed research international.

[7]  S. Bryant,et al.  An in vitro and in vivo comparison of cartilage growth in chondrocyte-laden matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels with localized transforming growth factor β3. , 2019, Acta biomaterialia.

[8]  W. Jeong,et al.  Coefficient of Variance as Quality Criterion for Evaluation of Advanced Hepatic Fibrosis Using 2D Shear‐Wave Elastography , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  S. Bryant,et al.  Characterization of the chondrocyte secretome in photoclickable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels , 2017, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  Shankar Lalitha Sridhar,et al.  Local Heterogeneities Improve Matrix Connectivity in Degradable and Photoclickable Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels for Applications in Tissue Engineering. , 2017, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[11]  M. Idzko,et al.  Biglycan expression in the melanoma microenvironment promotes invasiveness via increased tissue stiffness inducing integrin-β1 expression , 2017, Oncotarget.

[12]  Shankar Lalitha Sridhar,et al.  * Understanding the Spatiotemporal Degradation Behavior of Aggrecanase-Sensitive Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogels for Use in Cartilage Tissue Engineering. , 2017, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[13]  M. Baker.  Reproducibility: Respect your cells! , 2016, Nature.

[14]  S. Bryant,et al.  The In Vitro and In Vivo Response to MMP-Sensitive Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Hydrogels , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Franck J. Vernerey,et al.  Tuning Reaction and Diffusion Mediated Degradation of Enzyme‐Sensitive Hydrogels , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[16]  V. Kraus,et al.  Elucidating the Molecular Composition of Cartilage by Proteomics. , 2016, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  Stephanie J Bryant,et al.  An Enzyme‐Sensitive PEG Hydrogel Based on Aggrecan Catabolism for Cartilage Tissue Engineering , 2015, Advanced healthcare materials.

[18]  Kristi S Anseth,et al.  Covalently tethered TGF-β1 with encapsulated chondrocytes in a PEG hydrogel system enhances extracellular matrix production. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[19]  Justine J. Roberts,et al.  Comparison of photopolymerizable thiol-ene PEG and acrylate-based PEG hydrogels for cartilage development. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[20]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Degradation of Chain and Step-Polymerized Photodegradable Hydrogels , 2013, Macromolecules.

[21]  Justine J. Roberts,et al.  On the role of hydrogel structure and degradation in controlling the transport of cell-secreted matrix molecules for engineered cartilage. , 2013, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[22]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[23]  S. Bryant,et al.  Age impacts extracellular matrix metabolism in chondrocytes encapsulated in degradable hydrogels , 2012, Biomedical materials.

[24]  C. V. van Donkelaar,et al.  Tissue engineering of functional articular cartilage: the current status , 2011, Cell and Tissue Research.

[25]  Fan Yang,et al.  Recent progress in cartilage tissue engineering. , 2011, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[26]  S. Bryant,et al.  Gel structure has an impact on pericellular and extracellular matrix deposition, which subsequently alters metabolic activities in chondrocyte-laden PEG hydrogels. , 2011, Acta biomaterialia.

[27]  J. West,et al.  A bioresponsive hydrogel tuned to chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2011, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[28]  J. Hubbell,et al.  Enhanced proteolytic degradation of molecularly engineered PEG hydrogels in response to MMP-1 and MMP-2. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[29]  T. Oegema,et al.  Effect of Decorin and Dermatan Sulfate on the Mechanical Properties of a Neocartilage , 2010, Connective tissue research.

[30]  P. R. Weeren,et al.  Collagenase-1 (MMP-1) activity in equine synovial fluid: influence of age, joint pathology, exercise and repeated arthrocentesis. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[31]  J. Burdick,et al.  The influence of degradation characteristics of hyaluronic acid hydrogels on in vitro neocartilage formation by mesenchymal stem cells. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[32]  Ta-Jen Huang,et al.  Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[33]  M. McKee,et al.  Aged bovine chondrocytes display a diminished capacity to produce a collagen‐rich, mechanically functional cartilage extracellular matrix , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[34]  R E Guldberg,et al.  Variations in matrix composition and GAG fine structure among scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[35]  Ivan Martin,et al.  Age related changes in human articular chondrocyte yield, proliferation and post-expansion chondrogenic capacity. , 2004, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[36]  A. Metters,et al.  Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: Engineering cell-invasion characteristics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  H. Nielsen,et al.  Measurement of the noncomplexed free fraction of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 in plasma by immunoassay. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[38]  L. Cantley,et al.  Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  Q. Ye,et al.  Contribution of the C-terminal domain of metalloproteinases to binding by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases. C-terminal truncated stromelysin and matrilysin exhibit equally compromised binding affinities as compared to full-length stromelysin. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  S. Moskalewski,et al.  Synthesis of proteoglycans, collagen, and elastin by cultures of rabbit auricular chondrocytes--relation to age of the donor. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[41]  J. F. Woessner,et al.  The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. , 1961, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[42]  Markus Schulz,et al.  Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS): Past - Present - Future. , 2018, ALTEX.

[43]  Jürgen Frank,et al.  Serum-free cell culture: the serum-free media interactive online database. , 2010, ALTEX.

[44]  W. Li,et al.  Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases‐4 (TIMP‐4) gene expression is increased in human osteoarthritic femoral head cartilage , 2002, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[45]  D. Templeton.  The basis and applicability of the dimethylmethylene blue binding assay for sulfated glycosaminoglycans. , 1988, Connective tissue research.