Comparison of push and pull control strategies for supply network management in a make-to-stock environment

The performance differences of ‘push’ and ‘pull’ strategies for operational planning and control of a make-to-stock supply network under different environmental conditions (forecast error and initial levels of inventory) were explored. Results suggest that control strategy, forecast error and levels of inventory buffer all significantly affect each of the performance measures studied. Under all combinations of different conditions of inventory buffer level and forecast error, push outperforms pull in terms of customer service level and throughput, while pull outperforms push in term of total inventory. In terms of throughput and customer service level, push is more sensitive to forecast error but less sensitive to levels of inventory buffer than pull.

[1]  Norman Sadeh,et al.  MASCOT: An agent-based architecture for dynamic supply chain creation and coordination in the internet economy , 2001 .

[2]  Maurice Bonney,et al.  Are push and pull systems really so different , 1999 .

[3]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  The performance of push and pull systems: a simulation and comparative study , 1989 .

[4]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  A Petri net approach to investigating push and pull paradigms in flexible factory automated systems , 1996 .

[5]  Sema E. Alptekin,et al.  Product flexibility in selecting manufacturing planning and control strategy , 2000 .

[6]  R. Leonard,et al.  Production control strategies within multi-product batch manufacturing companies , 1993 .

[7]  Bhaba R. Sarker.  Simulating a just-in-time production system , 1989 .

[8]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban , 1990 .

[9]  V. Sridharan,et al.  The impact of safety stock on schedule instability, cost and service , 1989 .

[10]  Ricardo J. Rabelo,et al.  Managing distributed business processes in the virtual enterprise , 2001, J. Intell. Manuf..

[11]  M. Ristic,et al.  Fine planning for supply chains in semiconductor manufacture , 2000 .

[12]  V. Sridharan,et al.  Alternative approaches for reducing schedule instability in multistage manufacturing under demand uncertainty , 1995 .

[13]  Lloyd J. Taylor.  A Simulation Study of Work-in-Process Inventory Drive Systems and their Effect on Operational Measurements , 2000 .

[14]  Larry P. Ritzman,et al.  The relative significance of forecast errors in multistage manufacturing , 1993 .

[15]  Loren Paul Rees,et al.  A comparative analysis of an MRP lot-for-lot system and a Kanban system for a multistage production operation , 1989 .

[16]  V. Mabert,et al.  Special Research Focus on Supply Chain Linkages: Challenges for Design and Management in the 21st Century* , 1998 .

[17]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Reengineering the Order Fulfillment Process in Supply Chain Networks , 1996 .

[18]  Michael J. Magazine,et al.  Push and pull strategies for controlling multistage production systems , 2000 .

[19]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  A comparative study of the performance of push and pull systems in the presence of emergency orders , 2002 .

[20]  Hau L. Lee.  Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities , 1992 .

[21]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Material Management in Decentralized Supply Chains , 1993, Oper. Res..

[22]  Xiande Zhao,et al.  Freezing the master production schedule for material requirements planning systems under demand uncertainty , 1993 .

[23]  L. C. Lee.  A Comparative Study of the Push and Pull Production Systems , 1989 .

[24]  Lee J. Krajewski,et al.  Kanban, MRP, and Shaping the Manufacturing Environment , 1987 .

[25]  D. Lambert,et al.  Issues in Supply Chain Management , 2000 .

[26]  Michael A. Zazanis,et al.  Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons , 1992, Oper. Res..