Turning Collaboration into Transaction: A Case of Intranet Use in Boundary-Spanning Practices

This paper draws on Bourdieu's theory of practice and on observations from a qualitative case study to investigate how the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) affects boundary-spanning practices inside organizations. To understand boundary-spanning practices, we distinguish between collaborative and transactive practices, where the former is defined as the engagement of agents in the joint production of objects; whereas, the latter is defined as the engagement of agents in the exchange of objects produced separately by each party. We found that before the introduction of ICTs, agents relied primarily on relationships facilitated by individuals - boundary spanners. However, boundary spanners were overwhelmed with work, not available on all projects, and sometimes seen as biased. The Intranet was envisioned to replace boundary spanners with a boundary object to save on the communication overhead. The use of the system, however, also replaced a collaborative practice with a transactive one.

[1]  Niall Hayes,et al.  Boundless and bounded interactions in the knowledge work process: the role of groupware technologies , 2001, Inf. Organ..

[2]  Julie Rennecker.  The myth of spontaneous connection : an ethnographic study of the situated nature of virtual teamwork , 2001 .

[3]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[6]  Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmad At-Twaijri,et al.  The Impact of Context and Choice on the Boundary-Spanning Process: An Empirical Extension , 1987 .

[7]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  Natalia Levina.  Sharing Knowledge in Heterogeneous Environments , 2000 .

[10]  R. Gulati,et al.  The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Richard J. Boland,et al.  Place, space and knowledge work: a study of outsourced computer systems administrators , 2000 .

[14]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .

[18]  O. Hart,et al.  Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Turning a Community into a Market: A Practice Perspective on IT Use in Boundary-Spanning , 2005 .

[20]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel , 2000, First Monday.

[21]  Natalia Levina,et al.  From the Vendor's Perspective: Exploring the Value Proposition in IT Outsourcing , 2003 .

[22]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Natalia Levina,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implicationsfor Information Systems' Implementation Use , 2004 .

[24]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Discursive articulations of presence in virtual organizing , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[25]  R. Grant,et al.  A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF INTER-FIRM COLLABORATION. , 1995 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence From the B-2 , 1999 .

[28]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[29]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[30]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[31]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Multiple Faces of Codification: Organizational Redesign in an IT Organization , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[32]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[33]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Radical Innovation Without Collocation: A Case Study at Boeing-Rocketdyne , 2001, MIS Q..

[34]  Susan Gasson,et al.  The management of distributed organizational knowledge , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[35]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[36]  A. Adam.  Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .