Machine learning predicts per-vessel early coronary revascularization after fast myocardial perfusion SPECT: results from multicentre REFINE SPECT registry.

AIMS To optimize per-vessel prediction of early coronary revascularization (ECR) within 90 days after fast single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using machine learning (ML) and introduce a method for a patient-specific explanation of ML results in a clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 1980 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent stress/rest 99mTc-sestamibi/tetrofosmin MPI with new-generation SPECT scanners were included. All patients had invasive coronary angiography within 6 months after SPECT MPI. ML utilized 18 clinical, 9 stress test, and 28 imaging variables to predict per-vessel and per-patient ECR with 10-fold cross-validation. Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC) of ML was compared with standard quantitative analysis [total perfusion deficit (TPD)] and expert interpretation. ECR was performed in 958 patients (48%). Per-vessel, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.77, 0.80]) was higher than by regional stress TPD (0.71, [0.70, 0.73]), combined-view stress TPD (AUC 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72]), or ischaemic TPD (AUC 0.72, 95% CI [0.71, 0.74]), all P < 0.001. Per-patient, the AUC of ECR prediction by ML (AUC 0.81, 95% CI [0.79, 0.83]) was higher than that of stress TPD, combined-view TPD, and ischaemic TPD, all P < 0.001. ML also outperformed nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation of MPI for the prediction of early revascularization performance. A method to explain ML prediction for an individual patient was also developed. CONCLUSION In patients with suspected CAD, the prediction of ECR by ML outperformed automatic MPI quantitation by TPDs (per-vessel and per-patient) or nuclear cardiologists' expert interpretation (per-patient).

[1]  J. Case,et al.  Attenuation artifact, attenuation correction, and the future of myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  Guido Germano,et al.  Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. , 2011, European heart journal.

[3]  D. Berman,et al.  Clinical value of supine and upright myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients using the D-SPECT camera , 2014, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Daniel S. Berman,et al.  Prediction of revascularization after myocardial perfusion SPECT by machine learning in a large population , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  Donghee Han,et al.  Incremental role of resting myocardial computed tomography perfusion for predicting physiologically significant coronary artery disease: A machine learning approach , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Improved accuracy of myocardial perfusion SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease by machine learning in a large population , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  B. Reiser,et al.  Comparing the Areas Under Two Correlated ROC Curves: Parametric and Non‐Parametric Approaches , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[9]  Andrew J Einstein,et al.  ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  Damini Dey,et al.  Improved Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease Using a Support Vector Machine Algorithm , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Ying Fu,et al.  Cardiac hybrid SPECT/CTA imaging to detect “functionally relevant coronary artery lesion”: a potential gatekeeper for coronary revascularization? , 2014, Annals of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  J. Spertus,et al.  ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Am , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Annette M. Molinaro,et al.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[16]  J. Candell‐Riera,et al.  Relationship Between Myocardial Perfusion–Gated SPECT and the Performance of Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy , 2012, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[17]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[18]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Rationale and design of the REgistry of Fast Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with NExt generation SPECT (REFINE SPECT) , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[19]  D. Dey,et al.  Automatic Valve Plane Localization in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT/CT by Machine Learning: Anatomic and Clinical Validation , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  M. Motwani,et al.  Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis , 2016, European heart journal.

[21]  J. Friedman Special Invited Paper-Additive logistic regression: A statistical view of boosting , 2000 .

[22]  Alain Manrique,et al.  First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  Guido Germano,et al.  Combined supine and prone quantitative myocardial perfusion SPECT: method development and clinical validation in patients with no known coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  D. Berman,et al.  Quantitative Upright–Supine High-Speed SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease: Correlation with Invasive Coronary Angiography , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Myocardial stunning demonstrated with rest and post-stress measurements of left ventricular function using dual-isotope gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Nuclear medicine communications.

[26]  D. Dey,et al.  Deep Learning for Prediction of Obstructive Disease From Fast Myocardial Perfusion SPECT: A Multicenter Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[27]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Guido Germano,et al.  Clinical Gated Cardiac SPECT , 2006 .

[29]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.