Healthy-daylighting design for the living environment in apartments in Korea

An essential part of an indoor environment design is to deliver both the visual task needed as well as a healthy lighting system. In this article, healthy residential environment is discussed as an architectural field of light. The development and consolidation of health promotion is presented focusing the discussion on two areas of action: providing healthy light and eliminating harmful light within apartments. In Korea, the possibility for occupants to spend a large amount of time in the sun without proper protection is growing since, many balconies have been eliminated and there is a preference for large windows with improper orientation for the opening. When a balcony as a visual buffer space is eliminated, the distance between occupants and balcony window becomes closer and thus, there is a lager glass area of the window in the field of human view. Eliminating the balcony also removes the overhang structure which works as an obstruction to block the excessive penetration of sunlight. This results in the advent of harmful light in quantitative and qualitative ways; too much light, uncomfortable glare, and UV penetration. This paper discusses issues related to light and healthy living environment. Initially, it deals with the establishment of all design elements in terms of light and surveys examples of current designs. Architectural and optical solutions both to attenuate the harmfulness of light and to improve the visual satisfaction are given issued and their performance is reviewed.

[1]  Mohamed Boubekri,et al.  Window Sizing Procedures based on Vertical Illuminance and Degree of Discomfort Glare in Buildings Interiors , 2008 .

[2]  Karl Citek,et al.  Ultraviolet and short wavelength visible light exposure: why ultraviolet protection alone is not adequate. , 2006, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[3]  John Reynolds,et al.  Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings , 1971 .

[4]  D. Higgins,et al.  Housing and health: time again for public health action. , 2002, American journal of public health.

[5]  R. G. Hopkinson,et al.  Glare from daylighting in buildings. , 1972, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  J Grünberger,et al.  The effect of biologically-active light on the noo- and thymopsyche and on psychophysiological variables in healthy volunteers. , 1993, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  Wout J. M. van Bommel,et al.  Non-visual biological effect of lighting and the practical meaning for lighting for work. , 2006 .

[8]  Simon H. A. Begemann,et al.  Daylight, artificial light and people in an office environment, overview of visual and biological responses , 1997 .

[9]  Russell P. Leslie,et al.  Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? , 2003 .

[10]  P. R. Tregenza,et al.  View and discomfort glare from windows , 2007 .

[11]  R. Sommer Tight spaces; hard architecture and how to humanize it. , 1974 .

[12]  Mark Stanley Rea,et al.  The IESNA lighting handbook : reference & application , 2000 .