Adaptation Reveals a Neural Code for the Visual Location of Orientation Change

We apply an adaptation technique to explore the neural code for the visual location of textures defined by modulation of orientation over space. In showing that adaptation to textures modulated around one orientation shifts the perceived location of textures modulated around a different orientation, we demonstrate the existence of a neural code for the location of orientation change that generalises across orientation content. Using competitive adaptation, we characterise the neural processes underlying this code as single-opponent for orientation, that is with concentric excitatory/inhibitory receptive areas tuned to a single orientation.

[1]  J J Knierim,et al.  Neural responses to visual texture patterns in middle temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[3]  A. Mussap Orientation integration in detection and discrimination of contrast-modulated patterns , 2001, Vision Research.

[4]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Periodic-pattern-selective cells in monkey visual cortex , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  D Regan,et al.  Orientation-tuned spatial filters for texture-defined form , 1998, Vision Research.

[6]  H. Jones,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities , 1995, Nature.

[7]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Contextual Modulation in Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  B. S. Rubenstein,et al.  Effects of foreground scale in texture discrimination tasks: performance is size, shape, and content specific. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[9]  S W Zucker,et al.  Sensitivity to corners in flow patterns. , 1987, Spatial vision.

[10]  G. Sperling,et al.  Measuring the spatial frequency selectivity of second-order texture mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[11]  S W Zucker,et al.  Texture fields and texture flows: sensitivity to differences. , 1989, Spatial vision.

[12]  R F Hess,et al.  Adaptation to Spatial Offsets , 1995, Perception.

[13]  W. Newsome,et al.  The neurobiology of cognition , 1999, Nature.

[14]  H. Barlow,et al.  Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effects , 1963, Nature.

[15]  J. Wolfe The Vernier Aftereffect , 1987, Perception.

[16]  S Baldassi,et al.  Are there separate first-order and second-order mechanisms for orientation discrimination? , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  P. McGraw,et al.  The Influence of Adaptation on Perceived Visual , 1997 .

[18]  L. Ganz Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. , 1966, Psychological review.

[19]  N. Graham,et al.  Spatial summation in simple (fourier) and complex (non-fourier) texture channels , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order texture mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  F. Kingdom,et al.  A linear systems approach to the detection of both abrupt and smooth spatial variations in orientation-defined textures , 1996, Vision Research.

[22]  Jae S. Lim,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[23]  D. Levi,et al.  The influence of adaptation on perceived visual location , 1997, Vision Research.

[24]  D Regan,et al.  Spatial frequency discrimination and detection characteristics for gratings defined by orientation texture , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[26]  Sara Shute,et al.  Molyneux's question. Vision, touch, and the philosophy of perception , 1979, Medical History.

[27]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[28]  A Pentland,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation: The best PEST , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Jorge Herbert de Lira,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[30]  S. Dakin,et al.  Sensitivity to contrast modulation depends on carrier spatial frequency and orientation , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  A. Mussap,et al.  Alignment of orientation-modulated textures , 2000, Vision Research.

[32]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.