Gender Differences in the ICT Profile of University Students: A Quantitative Analysis’

This study responds to a call for research on how gender differences emerge in young generations of computer users. A large-scale survey involving 1138 university students in Flanders (Belgium) was conducted to examine the relationship between gender, computer access, attitudes, and uses in both learning and everyday activities of university students. The results show that women have a less positive attitude towards computers in general. However, their attitude towards computers for educational purposes does not differ from men’s. In the same way, being female is negatively related to computer use for leisure activities, but no relationship was found between gender and study-related computer use. Based on the results, it could be argued that computer attitudes are context-dependent constructs and that when dealing with gender differences, it is essential to take into account the context-specific nature of computer attitudes and uses.

[1]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Women, Work and Computerization , 2000, IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing.

[2]  J. Braak,et al.  Predicting teachers' generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Jane Abbiss,et al.  Gendering the ICT curriculum: The paradox of choice , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  R. Kay An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The Computer Attitude Measure (CAM) , 1993 .

[5]  Joanna Goode,et al.  Mind the Gap: The Digital Dimension of College Access , 2010 .

[6]  Kate J. Garland,et al.  Computer attitude scales: How relevant today , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart? , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Sin Yi Cheung,et al.  Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications , 2008 .

[9]  Mercedes López-Sáez,et al.  Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[11]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Gender and computers: similarities and differences in Iranian college students' attitudes toward computers , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Jan Hawkins,et al.  Computers and girls: Rethinking the issues , 1985 .

[13]  J. Cooper,et al.  The digital divide: the special case of gender , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Computer attitudes of primary and secondary students in South Africa , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Ioanna Vekiri,et al.  Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[16]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Development and validation of a computer attitude measure for young students (CAMYS) , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  J. Voogt,et al.  A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies , 2012 .

[18]  Els Kuiper,et al.  New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Jane Abbiss,et al.  Rethinking the ‘problem’ of gender and IT schooling: discourses in literature , 2008 .

[20]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[21]  Phyl Webb,et al.  Perhaps Its Time for a Fresh Approach to ICT Gender Research? , 2005, J. Res. Pract. Inf. Technol..

[22]  Hans Vermeersch,et al.  Why “Gender” disappeared from the gender gap: (re-)introducing gender identity theory to educational gender gap research , 2014 .

[23]  Preben H. Lindøe,et al.  Job characteristics and computer anxiety in the production industry , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[24]  M. Valcke,et al.  Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers , 2004 .

[25]  E. Rogers A Prospective and Retrospective Look at the Diffusion Model , 2004, Journal of health communication.

[26]  Marjolein Drent,et al.  Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Michel Ferrari,et al.  Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Ferran Ferrer,et al.  Tablet PCs, academic results and educational inequalities , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[29]  Sanna Talja,et al.  The social and discursive construction of computing skills , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[31]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales , 1984 .

[32]  Mike Younger,et al.  Student attitudes, image and the gender gap , 2000 .

[33]  J. Jenson,et al.  Women@Work: Listening to gendered relations of power in teachers' talk about new technologies , 2003 .

[34]  M. Volman,et al.  Gender Equity and Information Technology in Education: The Second Decade , 2001 .

[35]  B. Whitley Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[36]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Hi-tech = Guy-tech? An Exploration of Undergraduate Students’ Gendered Perceptions of Information and Communication Technologies , 2007 .

[37]  Milan Kubiatko,et al.  Slovak high school students' attitudes to ICT using in biology lesson , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  R. Hess,et al.  Gender differences in enrollment in computer camps and classes , 1985 .

[39]  VASILIOS MAKRAKIS,et al.  Gender, computers and other school subjects among Japanese and Swedish students , 1996, Comput. Educ..