Biochemical limits to microbial growth yields: An analysis of mixed substrate utilization

A theoretical analysis has been made of carbon conversion efficiency during heterotrophic microbial growth. The expectation was that the maximal growth yield occurs when all the substrate is assimilated and the net flow of carbon through dissimilation is zero. This, however, is not identical to a 100% carbon conversion, since assimilatory pathways lead to a net production of CO2. It can be shown that the amount of CO2 produced by way of assimilatory processes is dependent upon the nature of the carbon source, but independent of its degree of reduction and varies between 12 and 29% of the substrate carbon. An analysis of published yield data reveals that nearly complete assimilation can occur during growth on substrates with a high energy content. This holds for substrates with a heat of combustion of ca. 550 kJ/mol C, or a degree of reduction higher than 5 (e.g. ethane, ethanol, and methanol). Complete assimilation can also be achieved on substrates with a lower energy content, provided that an auxiliary energy source is present that cannot be used as a carbon source. This is evident from the cell yields reported for Candida utilis grown on glucose plus formate and for Thiobacillus versutus grown on acetate plus thiosulfate. This evaluation of the carbon conversion efficiency during assimilation also made it possible to compare the energy content of the auxiliary energy substrate added with the quantity of the carbon source it had replaced. It will be shown that utilization of the auxiliary energy source may lead to extreme changes in the efficiency of dissimilatory processes.

[1]  J. Duine,et al.  Glucose dehydrogenase from Acinetobacter calcoaceticus , 1979, FEBS letters.

[2]  P. M. Bruinenberg,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of NADPH Production and Consumption in Yeasts , 1983 .

[3]  J. P. van Dijken,et al.  Growth yields of microorganisms on methanol and methane. A theoretical study , 1975 .

[4]  W. Payne,et al.  Energy yields and growth of heterotrophs. , 1970, Annual review of microbiology.

[5]  J. Linton,et al.  A preliminary study on growth yields in relation to the carbon and energy content of various organic growth substrates , 1978 .

[6]  T. Ferenci,et al.  Evolutionary aspects of autotrophy. , 1978, Microbiological reviews.

[7]  D. Kelly,et al.  Biochemistry of the chemolithotrophic oxidation of inorganic sulphur. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  W. Hempfling,et al.  Effects of varying the carbon source limiting growth on yield and maintenance characteristics of Escherichia coli in continuous culture , 1975, Journal of bacteriology.

[9]  J. Monod,et al.  Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes , 1942 .

[10]  J. G. Kuenen,et al.  Energy transduction by electron transfer via a pyrrolo-quinoline quinone-dependent glucose dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (var. lwoffi) , 1985, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  K. Hellingwerf,et al.  Thermodynamics of growth. Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of bacterial growth. The phenomenological and the mosaic approach. , 1982, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  C. Edwards,et al.  The growth of Paracoccus denitrificans , 1977 .

[13]  J. R. Quayle,et al.  Microbial growth on C1 compounds. II. Synthesis of cell constituents by methanol- and formate-grown Pseudomonas AM 1, and methanol-grown Hyphomicrobium vulgare. , 1961, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  L. Dijkhuizen,et al.  A Pyridine Nucleotide-Independent Membrane-Bound Formate Dehydrogenase in Pseudomonas Oxalaticus OX1 , 1979 .