Longitudinal variability of time-location/activity patterns of population at different ages: a longitudinal study in California

BackgroundLongitudinal time-activity data are important for exposure modeling, since the extent to which short-term time-activity data represent long-term activity patterns is not well understood. This study was designed to evaluate longitudinal variations in human time-activity patterns.MethodWe report on 24-hour recall diaries and questionnaires collected via the internet from 151 parents of young children (mostly under age 55), and from 55 older adults of ages 55 and older, for both a weekday and a weekend day every three months over an 18-month period. Parents also provided data for their children. The self-administrated diary and questionnaire distinguished ~30 frequently visited microenvironments and ~20 activities which we selected to represent opportunities for exposure to toxic environmental compounds. Due to the non-normal distribution of time-location/activity data, we employed generalized linear mixed-distribution mixed-effect models to examine intra- and inter-individual variations. Here we describe variation in the likelihood of and time spent engaging in an activity or being in a microenvironment by age group, day-type (weekday/weekend), season (warm/cool), sex, employment status, and over the follow-up period.ResultsAs expected, day-type and season influence time spent in many location and activity categories. Longitudinal changes were also observed, e.g., young children slept less with increasing follow-up, transit time increased, and time spent on working and shopping decreased during the study, possibly related to human physiological changes with age and changes in macro-economic factors such as gas prices and the economic recession.ConclusionsThis study provides valuable new information about time-activity assessed longitudinally in three major age groups and greatly expands our knowledge about intra- and inter-individual variations in time-location/activity patterns. Longitudinal variations beyond weekly and seasonal patterns should be taken into account in simulating long-term time-activity patterns in exposure modeling.

[1]  Dick Ettema,et al.  Weekly rhythms in task and time allocation of households , 2009 .

[2]  C. Vionnet.  [Environmental health]. , 1983, Krankenpflege. Soins infirmiers.

[3]  K. Axhausen,et al.  An analysis of weekly out-of-home discretionary activity participation and time-use behavior , 2009 .

[4]  P. Lioy,et al.  Population-based exposure measurements in EPA region 5: a phase I field study in support of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey. , 1995, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[5]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Study of Use of Products and Exposure-Related Behaviors (SUPERB): study design, methods, and demographic characteristics of cohorts , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[6]  K. Mullan,et al.  Parenthood, Gender and Work-Family Time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. , 2010 .

[7]  Jianping Xue,et al.  Understanding variability in time spent in selected locations for 7–12-year old children , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[8]  Sonja N. Sax,et al.  Modeling time-location patterns of inner-city high school students in New York and Los Angeles using a longitudinal approach with generalized estimating equations , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[9]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  J. Sallis,et al.  Physical activity assessment methodology in the Five-City Project. , 1985, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  Thomas McCurdy,et al.  Developing meaningful cohorts for human exposure models , 2004, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[12]  Kai Elgethun,et al.  Comparison of global positioning system (GPS) tracking and parent-report diaries to characterize children's time–location patterns , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[13]  Beate Ritz,et al.  Feasibility of using web surveys to collect time–activity data , 2012, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[14]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Weekly Rhythm in Joint Time Expenditure for All At-Home and Out-of-Home Activities , 2008 .

[15]  A. McDermott,et al.  Using longitudinal data to understand children's activity patterns in an exposure context: Data from the Kanawha county health study , 1992 .

[16]  Gary K Grunwald,et al.  Analysis of repeated measures data with clumping at zero , 2002, Statistical methods in medical research.

[17]  Haiyi Xie,et al.  A Method for Analyzing Longitudinal Outcomes with Many Zeros , 2004, Mental health services research.

[18]  Thomas Mccurdy,et al.  Using human activity data in exposure models: Analysis of discriminating factors , 2003, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[19]  P. B. Ryan,et al.  Temporal variability of microenvironmental time budgets in Maryland , 1999, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[20]  D. Rosebrook,et al.  Personal exposures, indoor-outdoor relationships, and breath levels of toxic air pollutants measured for 355 persons in New Jersey , 1993 .

[21]  Ignace Glorieux,et al.  How many days? A comparison of the quality of time-use data from 2-day and 7-day diaries , 2009 .

[22]  W. H. Engelmann,et al.  The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants , 2001, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  Intra- and inter-individual variability in location data for two U.S. health-compromised elderly cohorts , 2009, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[24]  James A. Wiley,et al.  Study of children's activity patterns , 1991 .