Identifiability of causal effects with multiple causes and a binary outcome.

Unobserved confounding presents a major threat to causal inference from observational studies. Recently, several authors suggest that this problem may be overcome in a shared confounding setting where multiple treatments are independent given a common latent confounder. It has been shown that under a linear Gaussian model for the treatments, the causal effect is not identifiable without parametric assumptions on the outcome model. In this paper, we show that the causal effect is indeed identifiable if we assume a general binary choice model for the outcome with a non-probit link. Our identification approach is based on the incongruence between Gaussianity of the treatments and latent confounder, and non-Gaussianity of a latent outcome variable. We further develop a two-step likelihood-based estimation procedure.

[1]  Z. Geng,et al.  Identifying Causal Effects With Proxy Variables of an Unmeasured Confounder. , 2016, Biometrika.

[2]  J. Robins,et al.  Instruments for Causal Inference: An Epidemiologist's Dream? , 2006, Epidemiology.

[3]  E. C. Hammond,et al.  Smoking and lung cancer: recent evidence and a discussion of some questions. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Naïve regression requires weaker assumptions than factor models to adjust for multiple cause confounding , 2020, ArXiv.

[5]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Detecting the direction of causal time series , 2009, ICML '09.

[6]  David M. Blei,et al.  Using Embeddings to Correct for Unobserved Confounding , 2019, ArXiv.

[7]  Marloes H. Maathuis,et al.  Structure Learning in Graphical Modeling , 2016, 1606.02359.

[8]  Adler J. Perotte,et al.  Multiple Causal Inference with Latent Confounding , 2018, ArXiv.

[9]  Jonas Peters,et al.  Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals , 2015, 1501.01332.

[10]  Alexander D'Amour,et al.  On Multi-Cause Approaches to Causal Inference with Unobserved Counfounding: Two Cautionary Failure Cases and A Promising Alternative , 2019, AISTATS.

[11]  R. Koenker,et al.  Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Methods for Binary Response Models With Random Coefficients , 2018, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[12]  Peng Ding,et al.  Bayesian robust inference of sample selection using selection-t models , 2014, J. Multivar. Anal..

[13]  S. Cosslett.  DISTRIBUTION-FREE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR OF THE BINARY CHOICE MODEL1 , 1983 .

[15]  Yixin Wang,et al.  Multiple Causes: A Causal Graphical View , 2019, ArXiv.

[16]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .