The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

PURPOSE This study examined the ability of listeners using cochlear implants (CIs) and listeners with normal hearing (NH) to identify silent gaps of different duration and the relation of this ability to speech understanding in CI users. METHOD Sixteen NH adults and 11 postlingually deafened adults with CIs identified synthetic vowel-like stimuli that were either continuous or contained an intervening silent gap ranging from 15 ms to 90 ms. Cumulative d', an index of discriminability, was calculated for each participant. Consonant and consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word identification tasks were administered to the CI group. RESULTS Overall, the ability to identify stimuli with gaps of different duration was better for the NH group than for the CI group. Seven CI users had cumulative d' scores that were no higher than those of any NH listener, and their CNC word scores ranged from 0% to 30%. The other 4 CI users had cumulative d' scores within the range of the NH group, and their CNC word scores ranged from 46% to 68%. For the CI group, cumulative d' scores were significantly correlated with their speech testing scores. CONCLUSIONS The ability to identify silent gap duration may help explain individual differences in speech perception by CI users.

[1]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Comparison of Continuous Interleaved Sampling and Simultaneous Analog Stimulation Speech Processing Strategies in Newly Implanted Adults with a Clarion 1.2 Cochlear Implant , 2005, Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  R V Shannon,et al.  Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Mario A. Svirsky The multidimensional phoneme identification (MPI) model: A new quantitative framework to explain the perception of speech sounds by cochlear implant users , 2002 .

[4]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. Watson,et al.  Formant-frequency discrimination for isolated English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  P. Fitzgibbons,et al.  Gap detection in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Benjamin Munson,et al.  Phonetic identification in quiet and in noise by listeners with cochlear implants. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal gap resolution in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Psychophysical Performance and Mandarin Tone Recognition in Noise by Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[10]  Mario A. Svirsky,et al.  Acoustic and Electrical Pattern Analysis of Consonant Perceptual Cues Used by Cochlear Implant Users , 2003, Audiology and Neurotology.

[11]  D. Klatt,et al.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  D. Frisina,et al.  Relationships among age-related differences in gap detection and word recognition. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  G M Clark,et al.  Gap detection by early-deafened cochlear-implant subjects. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  HiResolutionTM and Conventional Sound Processing in the HiResolutionTM Bionic Ear: Using Appropriate Outcome Measures to Assess Speech Recognition Ability , 2004, Audiology and Neurotology.

[17]  C Muchnik,et al.  Auditory temporal resolution and open speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[18]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[19]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[20]  S. Staller,et al.  Speech perception abilities of adult and pediatric Nucleus implant recipients using the Spectral Peak (SPEAK) coding strategy. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[21]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. , 1962, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[22]  M A Svirsky,et al.  Mathematical modeling of vowel perception by users of analog multichannel cochlear implants: temporal and channel-amplitude cues. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[24]  R. Tyler Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations , 1992 .

[25]  M. Svirsky,et al.  The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users , 2007, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[26]  G M Clark,et al.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  M. Skinner,et al.  Evaluation of equivalency in two recordings of monosyllabic words. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  N. I. Durlach,et al.  Intensity Perception. II. Resolution in One‐Interval Paradigms , 1972 .

[30]  Norbert Dillier,et al.  A Software Tool for Analyzing Multichannel Cochlear Implant Signals , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[31]  R. Tyler,et al.  Temporal-gap detection by cochlear prosthesis users. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  M F Dorman,et al.  Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[33]  F K Kuk,et al.  Performance of some of the better cochlear-implant patients. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  B A Schneider,et al.  Gap detection thresholds as a function of tonal duration for younger and older listeners. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Joseph Roberson,et al.  Nucleus Freedom North American Clinical Trial , 2007, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[36]  S Buus,et al.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments. , 1984, Journal of speech and hearing research.