Citizens Vote to Act: smart contracts for the management of water resources in smart cities

Smart cities leverage Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) to enhance the quality of urban services. However, it is nowadays clear that the success of a smart city largely depends on the level of engagement of its citizens. In this paper we explore to what extent disruptive blockchain technologies can be used to incentivise the democratic participation of citizen. The investigated approach extends the standard IoT cycle 1) sense data, 2) cloudify and elaborate them, and 3) push information to the users. Here, the user takes an active role by means of data-informed votes on policies, therefore influencing behaviours. We illustrate such an approach by means of a proof-of-concept decentralised application (dApp) supporting the negotiation of polices for the management of urban water resources. The dApp consists of a smart contract that manages the execution of other smart contracts (the policies) according to the data-driven choices of the community. This use case demonstrates how suitably blockchain technologies can support fair and safe access to data and user engagement in smart cities.

[1]  Wessel Reijers,et al.  Now the Code Runs Itself: On-Chain and Off-Chain Governance of Blockchain Technologies , 2018, Topoi.

[2]  P. Siano,et al.  Iot-based smart cities: A survey , 2016, 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC).

[3]  Charles Shen,et al.  Blockchain for Cities—A Systematic Literature Review , 2018, IEEE Access.

[4]  Shivam Yadav,et al.  Smart water management using IOT , 2016, 2016 5th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Embedded Systems (WECON).

[5]  M. Bolívar,et al.  Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance , 2016 .

[6]  CRISTINA ROTTONDI,et al.  A Privacy-Friendly Gaming Framework in Smart Electricity and Water Grids , 2017, IEEE Access.

[7]  Zibin Zheng,et al.  An Overview of Blockchain Technology: Architecture, Consensus, and Future Trends , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Congress on Big Data (BigData Congress).

[8]  Nir Kshetri,et al.  Blockchain-Enabled E-Voting , 2018, IEEE Software.

[9]  Chris Dannen,et al.  Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners , 2017 .

[10]  Bingsheng Zhang,et al.  Brief Announcement: Statement Voting and Liquid Democracy , 2017, PODC.

[11]  Maria-Lluïsa Marsal-Llacuna Future living framework: Is blockchain the next enabling network? , 2017 .

[12]  Marcelo B. Nogueira,et al.  Telemetry for Domestic Water Consumption Based on IOT and Open Standards , 2018, 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT.

[13]  Ondrej Pribyl,et al.  Involving citizens in smart city projects: Systems engineering meets participation , 2016, 2016 Smart Cities Symposium Prague (SCSP).

[14]  Monique Snoeck,et al.  Citizen Participation in Smart Cities: Evaluation Framework Proposal , 2017, 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI).

[15]  Dylan S. Small,et al.  Individual Versus Team-Based Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2016, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Quinn DuPont Experiments in algorithmic governance : A history and ethnography of “The DAO,” a failed decentralized autonomous organization , 2017 .

[17]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  Understanding a Revolutionary and Flawed Grand Experiment in Blockchain: The DAO Attack , 2017, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[18]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Liquid Democracy: An Algorithmic Perspective , 2018, AAAI.

[19]  Theodora A. Varvarigou,et al.  Implementation of smart contracts for blockchain based IoT applications , 2018, 2018 9th International Conference on the Network of the Future (NOF).