Potential benefit from using the alpha(s1)-casein genotype information in a selection scheme for dairy goats.

A stochastic approach is proposed to predict responses to selection when using alpha(s1)-casein genotype information in a selection scheme of a Spanish breed of dairy goats. Two independent selection objectives were considered: protein yield (PY), where the major additive gene CSN1S1, which codes for alpha(s1)-casein, has a small effect, and protein content (P%), where this gene has a large effect on performances. Significant differences in response between using and ignoring information on the major gene were observed only when the major gene has a large effect. The main result was in the case of P%, the total genetic gain obtained in the early generations of selection was maintained in the long-term. Taking account of genotype information either in the evaluation model or in the selection criteria leads to a faster fixation of the favourable allele and a reduction of the total genetic variance over generations. The inbreeding rates varied across generations, the highest rates observed in later generations of selection and when the major gene has a large effect and its genotype was included in the genetic evaluation procedure. It is concluded that inclusion of the casein genotype as an additional selection criteria will improve gains for protein traits, in particular P%. Recommendations are also given in order to optimize the use of this molecular information in dairy goat selection programs.

[1]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Comparison of direct and marker-assisted selection with optimised contributions. , 2002 .

[2]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Potential benefit from using an identified major gene in BLUP evaluation with truncation and optimal selection , 1999, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[3]  J. Woolliams,et al.  Response to mass selection when an identified major gene is segregating , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[4]  J. Dekkers,et al.  Optimizing selection for quantitative traits with information on an identified locus in outbred populations , 1998 .

[5]  E. Manfredi,et al.  A dynamic deterministic model to evaluate breeding strategies under mixed inheritance , 1998, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[6]  A. Muñoz-serrano,et al.  Selection criteria for meat sheep improvement: Application in the Segureña breed , 1997 .

[7]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Potential gain from including major gene information in breeding value estimation , 1997, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[8]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Effect of including major gene information in mass selection: a stochastic simulation in a small population , 1997, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[9]  J. Jordana,et al.  Gene frequencies of caprine αs1-casein polymorphism in Spanish goat breeds , 1996 .

[10]  E. Manfredi,et al.  Influence du locus de la caséine αs1 sur les performances laitières et les paramètres génétiques des chèvres de race Alpine , 1995, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[11]  F. Hospital,et al.  A FORTRAN program to simulate the evolution of genetic variability in a small population , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[12]  J. Colleau,et al.  Marker assisted selection for genetic improvement of animal populations when a single QTL is marked. , 1995, Genetical research.

[13]  J. Gibson.  Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci. , 1994 .

[14]  M Quinton,et al.  Estimation of effects of single genes on quantitative traits. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[15]  M. Soller,et al.  Marker-assisted selection of candidate bulls for progeny testing programmes. , 1990 .

[16]  J. Foulley,et al.  Méthode de prise en compte de la consanguinité dans un modèle simple de simulation de performances , 1981, Annales de génétique et de sélection animale.