Scaling down from species to individuals: a flower–visitation network between individual honeybees and thistle plants

Studies of ecological networks usually focus upon interaction patterns among species. However, linkage among species is mediated by their constituting individuals. Thus, every linked species pair in a network encapsulates a new network of interacting individuals. Very few studies outside the sociology of larger animals have investigated networks at the level of the individual. Here, we analyse the structure of a flower–visitation network of individual thistles Cirsium arvense and honeybees Apis mellifera in a small meadow patch in Denmark. We marked and numbered 62 honeybees and 32 thistle stems and monitored all floral visits. The constructed bipartite network of individual plants and bees had a high connectance and low nestedness, but it was not significantly modular. Frequency distributions of number of links per species (i.e. linkage level) had their best fit to a truncated power law, and interactions were 1asymmetrical. Unipartite networks of either plants or bees had exceedingly short average path length and high clustering. Linkage level of plants increased with their number of flower heads and height of inflorescence (floral display parameters). Overall, the individual network of honeybees and thistles was denser linked than what is known from species pollination networks. Characteristics of both plants (e.g. floral display) and animals (e.g. foraging behaviour) are likely to generate this intra–specific, inter–individual link pattern. Such features of individual–individual networks may scale up and become important drivers of the structure and dynamics of species–species networks.

[1]  Leonardo Dominici Cruz,et al.  Nested diets: a novel pattern of individual-level resource use , 2010 .

[2]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[3]  Paulo Guimarães,et al.  Improving the analyses of nestedness for large sets of matrices , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[4]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[5]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Food-web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[7]  Daniel B. Stouffer,et al.  Nestedness versus modularity in ecological networks: two sides of the same coin? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[9]  Márcio S Araújo,et al.  Network analysis reveals contrasting effects of intraspecific competition on individual vs. population diets. , 2008, Ecology.

[10]  David Lusseau,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty into the study of animal social networks , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Comparison of social networks derived from ecological data: implications for inferring infectious disease dynamics. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[12]  Wirt Atmar,et al.  The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat , 1993, Oecologia.

[13]  G. Cussans,et al.  The importance of seeds and sexual reproduction in the population biology of Cirsium arvense ‐ a literature review , 1996 .

[14]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  K. Frisch The dance language and orientation of bees , 1967 .

[16]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[17]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Theodora Petanidou,et al.  Spatio‐temporal variation in the structure of pollination networks , 2009 .

[21]  J. Olesen,et al.  Ecological modules and roles of species in heathland plant-insect flower visitor networks. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[22]  N. Waltho,et al.  Organization of instabilities in multispecies systems, a test of hierarchy theory. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Patterns of Mutualistic Interactions in Pollination and Seed Dispersal: Connectance, Dependence Asymmetries, and Coevolution , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[24]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[25]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[26]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Mating system, life‐history, and reproduction in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense; Asteraceae) , 1994 .

[27]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Hierarchical organization in complex networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  T. Seeley Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[29]  H. Wells,et al.  HONEY BEE FORAGING ECOLOGY: OPTIMAL DIET, MINIMAL UNCERTAINTY OR INDIVIDUAL CONSTANCY? , 1983 .

[30]  T. Seeley,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGY OF HONEYBEE COLONIES IN A TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1982 .

[31]  J. Montoya,et al.  Small world patterns in food webs. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[33]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks , 2007 .

[34]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Program for Large Network Analysis , 1999 .

[35]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[36]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[37]  D. Lloyd,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. , 1976 .

[38]  A. Manning,et al.  Some Aspects of the Foraging Behaviour of Bumble-Bees , 1956 .

[39]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Ecological networks - foodwebs and beyond , 2009 .

[40]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Internet: Diameter of the World-Wide Web , 1999, Nature.

[42]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The roosting spatial network of a bird-predator bat. , 2009, Ecology.

[43]  Bee Visitors to Saguaro Flowers , 1959 .

[44]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[45]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Two degrees of separation in complex food webs , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  P. Pin,et al.  Assessing the relevance of node features for network structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  D. Janzen Euglossine Bees as Long-Distance Pollinators of Tropical Plants , 1971, Science.

[48]  J. Krause,et al.  Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[49]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Ecological networks : beyond food webs Ecological networks – beyond food webs , 2008 .