Occupant health and productivity : an Australian perspective

The issue of whether improved building services such as air quality, provision of daylight, thermal comfort etc, have a positive impact on the health and productivity of building occupants is still an open question. There is significant anecdotal evidence supporting the notion that health and productivity of building occupants can be improved by improving the quality of the indoor environment, but there are actually few published quantitative studies to substantiate this contention. This paper reports on a comprehensive review of the worldwide literature which relates health of building occupants with the different aspects of the indoor environment which are believed to impact of these issues, with a particular focus on studies in Australia, The paper analyses the existing research and identifies the key deficiencies in our existing understanding of this problem. The key focus of this research is office and school buildings, but the scope of the literature surveyed includes all commercial buildings, including industrial buildings. There is a notable absence of detailed studies on this link in Australian buildings, although there are studies on thermal comfort, and a number of studies on indoor air quality in Australia, which do not make the connection to health and productivity. Many international studies have focused on improved lighting, and in particular the provision of daylight in buildings, but again there are few studies in Australia which focus in this area.

[1]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY IS AFFECTED BY THE AIR QUALITY IN OFFICES , 2000 .

[2]  K. Cena,et al.  Thermal comfort and behavioural strategies in office buildings located in a hot-arid climate , 2001 .

[3]  D K Milton,et al.  Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. , 2000, Indoor air.

[4]  J. Daisey,et al.  A Survey and Critical Review of the Literature on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation and Health Symptoms in Schools. IEQ Strategies[TM]. , 1998 .

[5]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  A study of indoor carbon dioxide levels and sick leave among office workers , 2002, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[6]  M G Apte,et al.  Indoor air quality, ventilation and health symptoms in schools: an analysis of existing information. , 2003, Indoor air.

[7]  D. Wyon Enhancing productivity while reducing energy use in buildings , 2000 .

[8]  Jorge Kalil,et al.  Upper respiratory symptoms associated with aging of the ventilation system in artificially ventilated offices in São Paulo, Brazil. , 2002, Chest.

[9]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  THE CALIFORNIA HEALTHY BUILDING STUDY, PHASE 1: A SUMMARY , 1993 .

[10]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Field experiments on occupant comfort and office thermal environments in a hot-humid climate , 1994 .

[11]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Phase 1 of the California Healthy Building Study: A Summary , 1993 .

[12]  Ossama A. Abdou,et al.  Effects of Luminous Environment on Worker Productivity in Building Spaces , 1997 .

[13]  Rikard Küller,et al.  The subterranean work environment. Impact on well-being and health , 1996 .

[14]  E. Söderman,et al.  Improved health after intervention in a school with moisture problems. , 2000, Indoor air.

[15]  Umar Nimran,et al.  Perceived Facilitators and Inhibitors of Work Performance in an Office Environment , 1989 .

[16]  J Burt,et al.  Health symptoms and the work environment in four nonproblem United States office buildings. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[17]  Julian Di Stefano,et al.  Energy efficiency and the environment: the potential for energy efficient lighting to save energy and reduce carbon dioxide emissions at Melbourne University, Australia , 2000 .

[18]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Leadership : theory and practice , 1998 .