Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.

The authors examined how leader briefings and team-interaction training influence team members' knowledge structures concerning processes related to effective performance in both routine and novel environments. Two-hundred thirty-seven undergraduates from a large mid-Atlantic university formed 79 three-member tank platoon teams and participated in a low-fidelity tank simulation. Team-interaction training, leader briefings, and novelty of performance environment were manipulated. Findings indicated that both leader briefings and team-interaction training affected the development of mental models, which in turn positively influenced team communication processes and team performance. Mental models and communication processes predicted performance more strongly in novel than in routine environments. Implications for the role of team-interaction training, leader briefings, and mental models as mechanisms for team adaptation are discussed.

[1]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  The Relationship between Certain Group Process Variables and Group Problem-Solving Efficiency , 1960 .

[2]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[3]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[4]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[5]  J. Hackman A Normative Model of Work Team Effectiveness , 1983 .

[6]  D. L. Gladstein Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[7]  J. McGrath,et al.  Time and human interaction : toward a social psychology of time , 1986 .

[8]  N. M. Morris,et al.  On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models , 1986 .

[9]  J. Hackman,et al.  Leading groups in organizations , 1986 .

[10]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Timothy T. Baldwin,et al.  TRANSFER OF TRAINING: A REVIEW AND DIRECTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1988 .

[12]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[13]  J. Novak Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning , 1990 .

[14]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[15]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation , 1991 .

[16]  W. Boeker,et al.  Organizational performance and adaptation: effects of environment and performance on changes in board composition. , 1991, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[17]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[18]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. , 1992 .

[19]  K. Kelley,et al.  Issues, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology , 1992 .

[20]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of team performance functions. , 1992 .

[21]  E. Salas,et al.  Toward an understanding of team performance and training. , 1992 .

[22]  Robert W. Swezey,et al.  Teams: Their Training and Performance , 1992 .

[23]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[24]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[25]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[26]  E. Salas,et al.  Shared mental models in expert team decision making. , 1993 .

[27]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[28]  K. Weick The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[29]  Barbara G. Kanki,et al.  Cockpit Resource Management , 1993 .

[30]  Robert C. Ginnett,et al.  CREWS AS GROUPS: THEIR FORMATION AND THEIR LEADERSHIP. , 1993 .

[31]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[32]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research , 1994 .

[33]  Renee Johann Stout Effects of planning on the shared understanding of team member information requirements and efficient communication strategies , 1994 .

[34]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[35]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  GENERALIZATION OF EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT TRAINING TO THE JOB SETTING: INDIVIDUAL AND SITUATIONAL EFFECTS , 1995 .

[36]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Team performance on monitoring tasks: An examination of decision errors in contexts requiring sustained attention. , 1995 .

[37]  David Minionis,et al.  Enhancing team performance in adverse conditions: The role of shared team mental models and team training on an interdependent task. , 1995 .

[38]  R. Hill,et al.  Metaphors and Mental Models: Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Innovative and Entrepreneurial Activities , 1995 .

[39]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations , 1995 .

[40]  Clint A. Bowers,et al.  Networked simulations: New paradigms for team performance research , 1995 .

[41]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[42]  G. Stewart,et al.  Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Team Performance Assessment and Measurement: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Series in Applied Psychology. , 1997 .

[44]  E. Salas,et al.  A Framework for Developing Team Performance Measures in Training , 1997 .

[45]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[46]  E. Salas,et al.  Team performance assessment and measurement , 1997 .

[47]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The measurement of team process behavior in the cockpit: Lessons learned , 1997 .

[48]  E. Salas,et al.  Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. , 1997, Group dynamics : theory, research, and practice : the official journal of Division 49, Group Psychology and Group Psychotherapy of the American Psychological Association.

[49]  P. Goodman Designing effective work groups , 1999 .

[50]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.