Generalized mass-transfer correction factor for nanofiltration and reverse osmosis

The assessment of the concentration polarization in pressure-driven membrane modules is fundamental for their design and optimization. To account for the suction effect in nanofiltration (NF)/reverse osmosis (RO) membrane modules, a correction factor for conventional mass-transfer coefficients at vanishing mass-transfer rates was obtained through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of a symmetrical NF/RO rectangular channel with fully developed laminar flow, for a wide range of operating conditions. The correction factor is defined as Ξ = Sh/Sh0, where Sh is the Sherwood number with suction and Sh0 is the Sherwood number for impermeable walls and low mass-transfer rates. For the range of dimensionless numbers assigned in the simulations, it was found by fitting of CFD data that Ξ depends only on ϕ = Pe/Sh0, through the correlation Ξ = ϕ + (1 + 0.26ϕ1.4)−1.7, where Pe is the permeation Peclet number. This correlation can be used to predict the average concentration polarization index, Γ = R/(Ξ/ϕ − R), where R is the intrinsic rejection, with an average relative error of 3.2%. The correlation obtained appears to be suitable to determine mass-transfer coefficients at high mass-transfer rates, independently of the membrane module geometry and the flow regime. Moreover, unlike the correction factor correlations available in the literature, the generalized correlation accurately predicts the concentration polarization index for ϕ < 20. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006

[1]  B. Stanmore,et al.  Ionic mass transfer in parallel plate electrochemical cells , 1972 .

[2]  Sirshendu De,et al.  Prediction of mass-transfer coefficient with suction in the applications of reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration , 1997 .

[3]  Sunando DasGupta,et al.  Prediction of mass transfer coefficient with suction for turbulent flow in cross flow ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[4]  V. Gekas,et al.  Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow : II. Application to the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes , 1988 .

[5]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  Numerical modelling of mass transfer in slits with semi‐permeable membrane walls , 2000 .

[6]  A. S. Berman.  Laminar Flow in Channels with Porous Walls , 1953 .

[7]  Vassilis Gekas,et al.  Mass transfer in the membrane concentration polarization layer under turbulent cross flow , 1987 .

[8]  Andrew L. Zydney,et al.  Stagnant film model for concentration polarization in membrane systems , 1997 .

[9]  Philippe Moulin,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to membranes: State of the art and opportunities , 2006 .

[10]  Mass and Heat Transfer to Spheres, Cylinders and Planar Surfaces: A Unified "Film" Model Description , 2001 .

[11]  S. J. Davies,et al.  An experimental study of the flow of water in pipes of rectangular section , 1928 .

[12]  David F. Fletcher,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of flow and permeation for pressure-driven membrane processes , 2002 .

[13]  Thomas K. Sherwood,et al.  Salt Concentration at Phase Boundaries in Desalination by Reverse Osmosis , 1965 .

[14]  C. A. Smolders,et al.  Mass transfer coefficients in cross-flow ultrafiltration , 1989 .

[15]  Viriato Semiao,et al.  Concentration polarisation and flow structure within nanofiltration spiral-wound modules with ladder-type spacers , 2004 .

[16]  João M. Miranda,et al.  Mass transfer in the vicinity of a separation membrane: the applicability of the stagnant film theory , 2002 .