Computing in Thermal Equilibrium With Dipole-Coupled Nanomagnets

In the 1970s, work at IBM by Charles Bennett suggested the possibility of a computer operating near thermal equilibrium and dissipating energy near the thermodynamic limits. Here, we demonstrate experimentally that a computing architecture based on dipole-coupled nanomagnets can operate near thermal equilibrium without the assistance of externally applied magnetic fields. The dynamics of digital signal propagation is demonstrated with micromagnetic simulation and then verified experimentally using time-lapse photoemission electron microscopy. A logic gate that computes using energy from the thermal bath without external fields is also demonstrated. Nanomagnetic logic circuits operating under these conditions are expected to dissipate energy near the fundamental thermodynamic limits of computation.

[1]  Wolfgang Porod,et al.  Clocking structures and power analysis for nanomagnet-based logic devices , 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Low power electronics and design (ISLPED '07).

[2]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  The thermodynamics of computation—a review , 1982 .

[3]  Howard A. Padmore,et al.  X-ray photoemission electron microscopy, a tool for the investigation of complex magnetic structures. , 2001 .

[4]  Wolfgang Porod,et al.  Bridging the gap between nanomagnetic devices and circuits , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Computer Design.

[5]  Lev Davidovich Landau,et al.  ON THE THEORY OF THE DISPERSION OF MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY IN FERROMAGNETIC BODIES , 1935 .

[6]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Notes on Landauer's Principle, Reversible Computation, and Maxwell's Demon , 2002, physics/0210005.

[7]  Michael T. Niemier,et al.  System-level energy and performance projections for nanomagnet-based logic , 2009, 2009 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures.

[8]  S. Datta,et al.  Interacting systems for self-correcting low power switching , 2006, cond-mat/0611569.

[9]  Thomas Schrefl,et al.  Micromagnetic modelling—the current state of the art , 2000 .

[10]  J. Bokor,et al.  Simulation studies of nanomagnet-based logic architecture. , 2008, Nano letters (Print).

[11]  R. Landauer,et al.  Irreversibility and heat generation in the computing process , 1961, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[12]  M J Donahue,et al.  OOMMF User's Guide, Version 1.0 , 1999 .

[13]  W. Porod,et al.  Power dissipation in nanomagnetic logic devices , 2004, 4th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology, 2004..

[14]  H. T. Kung Why systolic architectures? , 1982, Computer.

[15]  S. Datta,et al.  Switching Energy of Ferromagnetic Logic Bits , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[16]  T. Gilbert A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  W. Brown Thermal Fluctuations of a Single‐Domain Particle , 1963 .

[18]  R. Cowburn Probing antiferromagnetic coupling between nanomagnets , 2002 .

[19]  A Imre,et al.  Majority Logic Gate for Magnetic Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata , 2006, Science.

[20]  V. Crespi,et al.  Artificial ‘spin ice’ in a geometrically frustrated lattice of nanoscale ferromagnetic islands , 2006, Nature.