Optimal MR Protocol for Hepatic Hemangiomas

Purpose: To compare conventional spin-echo (SE) sequences with T2-weighted turbo SE and serial gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted FLASH sequences in the detection and characterization of hepatic hemangiomas, and to describe the enhancement characteristics of the lesions on dynamic MR imaging. Material and Methods: Forty-two patients with 66 hemangiomas were studied at 1.0 T or 1.5 T by using conventional SE sequences (T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and heavily T2-weighted), T2-weighted turbo SE sequences, and breath-hold T1-weighted FLASH sequences acquired before, immediately after, and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 min after injection of a bolus of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Images were quantitatively analyzed for lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise (C/N) ratios, and qualitatively analyzed for lesion conspicuity. The enhancement pattern and the rapidity of enhancement were analyzed in small (<15 mm), medium (15-39 mm), and large (>39 mm) hemangiomas. Results: In T2-weighted images, T2-weighted turbo SE and heavily T2-weighted SE images had higher C/N ratios than T2-weighted SE images (p=0.003). Lesion conspicuity was not significantly different in these 3 sequences (p=0.307). In T1-weighted images, T1-weighted FLASH images had higher C/N (p<0.001) and also better lesion conspicuity (p<0.001) than T1-weighted SE images. Immediate uniform enhancement was seen in 43% of small hemangiomas (9 of 21 lesions), and persistent central hypo-intensity was seen in 73% of large hemangiomas (11 of 15 lesions). Rapid enhancement was seen in 62% of small hemangiomas (13 of 21 lesions) and in 31% of medium or large hemangiomas (14 of 45 lesions). Conclusion: Further clinical study is needed for evaluating the differential diagnostic advantages of turbo SE T2-weighted imaging compared to the calculation of T2-values by means of a SE T2-weighted sequence. However, the results of the present study suggest that T2-weighted turbo SE imaging and precontrast and serial gadolinium-enhanced FLASH imaging have the potential to replace conventional SE imaging in the evaluation of hepatic hemangiomas.

[1]  U. Klose,et al.  Dynamic Sequential MR Imaging of Focal Liver Lesions: Initial Experience in 22 Patients at 1.5 T , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic metastases from hepatic hemangiomas and cysts by using MR imaging. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  M Lüning,et al.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  Hepatic tumors: Magnetization transfer MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  S. Mirowitz,et al.  T2-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen: fast spin-echo vs conventional spin-echo sequences. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging. Efficacy of T2 values at 0.35 and 1.5 T. , 1988, Radiology.

[7]  B. I. Choi,et al.  Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver: CT and MR imaging in 10 cases. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  S. Lelcuk,et al.  [Giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver]. , 1996, Harefuah.

[9]  R. Semelka,et al.  Hypervascular malignant liver lesions: comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[10]  R. Edelman,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance on T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images. , 1994, Radiology.

[11]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T. , 1993, Radiology.

[12]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Distinction of hepatic cavernous hemangioma from hepatic metastases with MR imaging. , 1988, Radiology.

[13]  D. Mitchell,et al.  Hepatic metastases and cavernous hemangiomas: distinction with standard- and triple-dose gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  K. Ohtomo,et al.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. , 1989, Radiology.

[15]  Differentiation between hemangiomas and hepatocellular carcinomas with the apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from turboflash MR images , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  B Hamm,et al.  Differentiation of hepatic hemangiomas from metastases by dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  A. Okada,et al.  Hemangioma of the liver. Diagnosis with combined use of laparoscopy and hepatic arteriography. , 1975, American journal of surgery.

[18]  P. Ros,et al.  Hemangioma of the liver: heterogeneous appearance on T2-weighted images. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  F C Simm,et al.  Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. , 1992, Radiology.

[20]  B. I. Choi,et al.  Small hepatocellular carcinoma versus small cavernous hemangioma: differentiation with MR imaging at 2.0 T. , 1990, Radiology.

[21]  S. Saini,et al.  Differentiation between small hepatic hemangiomas and metastases on MR images: importance of size-specific quantitative criteria. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2-weighted conventional spin-echo MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[23]  P. Soyer,et al.  MR diagnosis of hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors versus hemangiomas: relative merits of dynamic gadolinium chelate-enhanced gradient-recalled echo and unenhanced spin-echo images. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  W. Meyers,et al.  Hepatic hemangiomas vs metastases: MR differentiation at 1.5 T. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  B. Siewert,et al.  Fast MR imaging of the liver: quantitative comparison of techniques. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions: role of spin-echo and contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.