The functions of formulaic and nonformulaic compliments in interactions about technical writing

Writing tutors are encouraged to use compliments in their interactions with technical writing students. However, the form of compliments strongly influences how they function. Specifically, formulaic compliments like "It's good" function differently from nonformulaic compliments like "The size is excellent in terms of visually aiding the reader." A total of 107 compliments were analyzed from 13 interactions between 12 writing tutors and 12 engineering students. About 61% of tutors' compliments followed one of six formulae, and about 39% were nonformulaic. Formulaic compliments were general and mainly performed a phatic function, filling pauses and avoiding silence, particularly in interaction closings. Nonformulaic compliments were more specific and individualized, and they may, therefore, be more instructive than formulaic compliments. Nonformulaic compliments also performed an exploratory function, allowing participants to renegotiate discourse status. This study points to other avenues of research, particularly research that systemically examines writers' perceptions of formulaic and nonformulaic feedback, such as compliments.

[1]  Ted Brown Unkind Cuts: Rethinking the Rhetoric of Academic Job Rejection Letters , 1993 .

[2]  Diana Boxer Complaining and Commiserating: A Speech Act View of Solidarity in Spoken American English , 1993 .

[3]  R. Boyle,et al.  'You've worked with Elizabeth Taylor!': phatic functions and implicit , 2000 .

[4]  I. Kecskés A cognitive-pragmatic approach to situation-bound utterances , 2000 .

[5]  Carolyn P. Walker,et al.  Writing Conference Talk: Factors Associated with High- and Low-Rated Writing Conferences. , 1987 .

[6]  R. Moon Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach , 1998 .

[7]  Michael Alley The craft of editing : a guide for managers, scientists, and engineers , 2000 .

[8]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Sugaring the Pill: Praise and Criticism in Written Feedback. , 2001 .

[9]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Ill-formedness and transformability in Portuguese idioms , 1993 .

[10]  Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig,et al.  Congruence in Native and Nonnative Conversations: Status Balance in the Academic Advising Session * , 1990 .

[11]  R. Fawcett Language as social semiotic , 1984 .

[12]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[13]  M. Agar,et al.  Institutional discourse , 1985 .

[14]  M. González Politeness: some universals in language usage , 1995 .

[15]  Robert K. Herbert,et al.  Sex-based differences in compliment behavior , 1990, Language in Society.

[16]  R I Grange Technical editing. , 1996, British journal of urology.

[17]  Anita M. Pomerantz Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-operation of Multiple Constraints , 1978, Asking and Telling in Conversation.

[18]  J. Mackiewicz,et al.  The effects of tutor expertise in engineering writing: a linguistic analysis of writing tutors' comments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  Diana Boxer,et al.  Ethnographic interviewing as a research tool in speech act analysis: The case of complaints , 2006 .

[20]  E. Schegloff Reflections on Quantification in the Study of Conversation , 1993 .

[21]  Terese Thonus,et al.  How to communicate politely and be a tutor, too: NS-NNS interaction and writing center practice , 1999 .

[22]  Diana Van Lancker-Sidtis,et al.  Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: methods for classification and verification , 2004 .

[23]  D. Lancker,et al.  Is your syntactic component really necessary , 2001 .

[24]  S. Kemper,et al.  What could reaction-time studies be telling us about metaphor comprehension? , 1987 .

[25]  Florian Coulmas,et al.  The Compliment Formula , 1981 .

[26]  Alison Wray,et al.  Formulaic Language and the Lexicon: List of Figures and Tables , 2002 .

[27]  Adam Jaworski,et al.  “This is not an empty compliment!” Polish compliments and the expression of solidarity , 1995 .

[28]  I. Fónagy Communication in Poetry , 1961 .

[29]  Douglas Salerno An Interpersonal Approach to Writing Negative Messages , 1986 .

[30]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  The Technical Editor as Diplomat: Linguistic Strategies for Balancing Clarity and Politeness , 2003 .

[31]  Janet Holmes,et al.  Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy , 1988 .

[32]  Alison Wray,et al.  The functions of formulaic language: an integrated model , 2000 .

[33]  Andrea Golato Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk , 2003 .

[34]  Stephen M. North,et al.  The Idea of a Writing Center , 1984, College English.

[35]  James R. Nattinger,et al.  Lexical Phrases and Language Teaching , 1992 .

[36]  Mohan R. Limaye Buffers in Bad News Messages and Recipient Perceptions , 1988 .

[37]  Kathleen J. Krone,et al.  Characteristics of Rejection Letters and their Effects on Job Applicants , 1984 .

[38]  Annabelle Hernández Herrero Analysis and comparison of complimenting behavior in costa rican spanish and american english , 1999 .

[39]  Kitty O. Locker Factors in Reader Responses to Negative Letters , 1999 .

[40]  David A. Morand,et al.  Language and power: an empirical analysis of linguistic strategies used in superior–subordinate communication , 2000 .

[41]  G Vallar,et al.  Understanding metaphors and idioms: A single-case neuropsychological study in a person with Down syndrome , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[42]  J. Laver,et al.  Linguistic Routines and Politeness in Greeting and Parting , 1981 .

[43]  Mohan R. Limaye Further Conceptualization of Explanation in Negative Messages , 1997 .

[44]  N. Dirubbo,et al.  You Just Don??t Understand , 1992 .