Willingness to pay for the rural telephone service in Bangladesh and Peru

This paper measures the rural households' willingness to pay (WTP) for access to public telephone services in Bangladesh and Peru through contingent valuation methods. The development of contingent valuation methods together with the econometric expansion of qualitative response models has permitted an approximation to the consumer surplus in the presence of externalities, public good and information asymmetries. The paper utilizes both parametric and nonparametric estimations that are commonly observed in the literature concerned with the estimation of WTP. The main result of the paper suggest that rural telecommunications projects are welfare enhancing, since households' WTP are higher than the prevailing tariff rates. For Peru, households' currently pay US$0.14 for local calls and US$ 0.29 for national long distance calls (LDN), while their WTP for a local call varies from US$0.25 to US$0.35, and for a LDN call varies from US$0.33 to US$0.45. For Bangladesh, households' WTP for a local call varies from US$0.10 to US$0.26, for a LDN call from US$0.23 to US$0.50, and for an international call from US$0.93 to US$1.35. Meanwhile, they are currently paying US$ 0.03, US$ 0.06 and US$ 0.46 respectively. Despite the fact that the monetary measures of WTP vary depending on measurement methods, the results are consistent for all the parametric and non-parametric measures utilized suggesting that the rural telecommunications projects in Bangladesh and Peru are directly contributing to the improvement of welfare of rural households.

[1]  Per-Olov Johansson,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Comment , 1989 .

[2]  M. An,et al.  A Semiparametric Distribution for Willingness to Pay and Statistical Inference with Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data , 2000 .

[3]  Bengt Kriström,et al.  A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. , 1990 .

[4]  Shyamal K. Chowdhury.  Institutional and Welfare Aspects of the Provision and Use of Information and Communication Technologies in the Rural Areas of Bangladesh and Peru , 2002 .

[5]  Peter Bohm,et al.  Estimating willingness to pay: Why and how? , 1979 .

[6]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses , 1984 .

[7]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Efficient Estimation Methods for "Closed-ended' Contingent Valuation Surveys , 1987 .

[8]  Daniel McFadden,et al.  Contingent Valuation and Social Choice , 1994 .

[9]  Robert Cameron Mitchell,et al.  Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method , 1989 .

[10]  Joachim von Braun,et al.  Village Pay Phones and Poverty Reduction: Insights from a Grameen Bank Initiative in Bangladesh , 1999 .

[11]  Trudy Ann Cameron,et al.  Referendum Contingent Valuation Estimates: Sensitivity to the Assignment of Offered Values , 1991 .

[12]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[13]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Valuing Environmental Preferences , 2001 .

[14]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Contingent valuation : a critical assessment , 1993 .

[15]  Clifford S. Russell,et al.  Willingness to Pay : Referendum Contingent Valuation and Uncertain Project Benefits , 1999 .

[16]  Christopher Cornwell,et al.  Survey Response‐Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management , 2000 .

[17]  Timothy C. Haab,et al.  Referendum Models and Negative Willingness to Pay: Alternative Solutions , 1997 .

[18]  S. Chowdhury.  ATTAINING UNIVERSAL ACCESS: PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AND BUSINESS-NGO PARTNERSHIP , 2002 .

[19]  John R. Stoll,et al.  Use of Dichotomous Choice Nonmarket Methods to Value the Whooping Crane Resource , 1988 .

[20]  M. Harway,et al.  Annual Report 1999 , 2000 .

[21]  David Throsby,et al.  Individual preferences and the demand for military expenditure , 2001 .

[22]  David A. Patterson,et al.  Inference and Optimal Design for a Welfare Measure in Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation , 1991 .

[23]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA , 1996 .