Plants alter their vertical root distribution rather than biomass allocation in response to changing precipitation.

Elucidating the variation of allocation pattern of ecosystem net primary productivity (NPP) and its underlying mechanisms are critically important for understanding the changes of aboveground and belowground ecosystem functions. Under optimal partitioning theory, plants should allocate more NPP to the organ that acquires the most limiting resource, and this expectation has been widely used to explain and predict NPP allocation under changing precipitation. However, confirmatory evidence for this theory has mostly come from observed spatial variation in the relationship between precipitation and NPP allocation across ecosystems, rather than directly from the influences of changing precipitation on NPP allocation within systems. We performed a six-year five-level precipitation manipulation experiment in a semiarid steppe to test whether changes in NPP allocation can be explained by the optimal partitioning theory, and how water requirement of plant community is maintained if NPP allocation is unaltered. The total 30 precipitation levels (five-level × six-year) were divided into dry, nominal and wet precipitation ranges, relative to historical precipitation variation over the past six decades. We found that NPP in both aboveground (ANPP) and belowground (BNPP) increased nonlinearly as precipitation decreased, while the allocation of NPP to BNPP (fBNPP ) showed a concave quadratic relationship with precipitation. The declined fBNPP as precipitation increased in the dry range supported the optimal partitioning theory. However, in the nominal range, NPP allocation was not influenced by the changed precipitation; instead, BNPP was distributed more in the surface soil horizon (0-10 cm) as precipitation increased, and conversely more in the deeper soil layers (10-30 cm) as precipitation decreased. This response in root foraging appears to be a strategy to satisfy plant water requirements and partially explains the stable NPP allocation patterns. Overall, our results suggest that plants can adjust their vertical BNPP distribution in response to drought stress, and that only under extreme drought does the optimal partitioning theory strictly apply, highlighting the context dependency of the adaption and growth of plants under changing precipitation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

[1]  Melinda D. Smith,et al.  Semiarid ecosystem sensitivity to precipitation extremes: weak evidence for vegetation constraints. , 2019, Ecology.

[2]  Guiyao Zhou,et al.  Drought-induced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphological traits: Evidence from a synthesis of global field trials. , 2018, Plant, cell & environment.

[3]  Ava M. Hoffman,et al.  A reality check for climate change experiments: Do they reflect the real world? , 2018, Ecology.

[4]  Sydney K. Jones,et al.  Species reordering, not changes in richness, drives long-term dynamics in grassland communities. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[5]  S. Niu,et al.  Net primary productivity and its partitioning in response to precipitation gradient in an alpine meadow , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Yong Jiang,et al.  Exacerbated nitrogen limitation ends transient stimulation of grassland productivity by increased precipitation , 2017 .

[7]  Shiping Chen,et al.  Asymmetric sensitivity of ecosystem carbon and water processes in response to precipitation change in a semi‐arid steppe , 2017 .

[8]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Grassland species respond differently to altered precipitation amount and pattern , 2017 .

[9]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Nonlinear responses of land ecosystems to variation in precipitation. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[10]  J. Blair,et al.  Does ecosystem sensitivity to precipitation at the site-level conform to regional-scale predictions?. , 2015, Ecology.

[11]  W. Shanshan,et al.  Responses of soil moisture to precipitation pattern change in semiarid grasslands in Nei Mongol, China , 2016 .

[12]  Osvaldo E Sala,et al.  Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass- and increases shrub-productivity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink , 2015, Science.

[14]  A. Knapp,et al.  Contrasting above‐ and belowground sensitivity of three Great Plains grasslands to altered rainfall regimes , 2015, Global change biology.

[15]  L. Mommer,et al.  Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  H. Fowler,et al.  Future changes to the intensity and frequency of short‐duration extreme rainfall , 2014 .

[17]  W. Parton,et al.  Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming. , 2014, The New phytologist.

[18]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Net primary productivity and rain‐use efficiency as affected by warming, altered precipitation, and clipping in a mixed‐grass prairie , 2013, Global change biology.

[19]  Kerry M. Byrne,et al.  Contrasting Effects of Precipitation Manipulations on Production in Two Sites within the Central Grassland Region, USA , 2013, Ecosystems.

[20]  O. Sala,et al.  Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: theory and data synthesis , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Wijk.  Understanding plant rooting patterns in semi-arid systems: an integrated model analysis of climate, soil type and plant biomass , 2011 .

[22]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to temperature and precipitation change: a meta‐analysis of experimental manipulation , 2011 .

[23]  S. Collins,et al.  A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. , 2009, Ecology.

[24]  J. Blair,et al.  Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome , 2009 .

[25]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Consequences of More Extreme Precipitation Regimes for Terrestrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[26]  Jianhui Huang,et al.  Primary production and rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Mongolia Plateau. , 2008, Ecology.

[27]  Shan Lin,et al.  Belowground net primary productivity and biomass allocation of a grassland in Inner Mongolia is affected by grazing intensity , 2008, Plant and Soil.

[28]  Brian J. Enquist,et al.  Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation , 2007 .

[29]  A. Prokushkin,et al.  Critical analysis of root : shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes , 2006 .

[30]  Robert B Jackson,et al.  Geographical and interannual variability in biomass partitioning in grassland ecosystems: a synthesis of field data. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[31]  W. Pockman,et al.  Precipitation pulses and carbon fluxes in semiarid and arid ecosystems , 2004, Oecologia.

[32]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes , 1996, Oecologia.

[33]  J. Blair,et al.  Rainfall Variability, Carbon Cycling, and Plant Species Diversity in a Mesic Grassland , 2002, Science.

[34]  O. Sala,et al.  A rainout shelter design for intercepting different amounts of rainfall , 2002, Oecologia.

[35]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .