Voxel‐wise quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiac magnetic resonance. Feasibility and methods comparison

The purpose of this study is to enable high spatial resolution voxel‐wise quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion in dynamic contrast‐enhanced cardiovascular MR, in particular by finding the most favorable quantification algorithm in this context. Four deconvolution algorithms—Fermi function modeling, deconvolution using B‐spline basis, deconvolution using exponential basis, and autoregressive moving average modeling —were tested to calculate voxel‐wise perfusion estimates. The algorithms were developed on synthetic data and validated against a true gold‐standard using a hardware perfusion phantom. The accuracy of each method was assessed for different levels of spatial averaging and perfusion rate. Finally, voxel‐wise analysis was used to generate high resolution perfusion maps on real data acquired from five patients with suspected coronary artery disease and two healthy volunteers. On both synthetic and perfusion phantom data, the B‐spline method had the highest error in estimation of myocardial blood flow. The autoregressive moving average modeling and exponential methods gave accurate estimates of myocardial blood flow. The Fermi model was the most robust method to noise. Both simulations and maps in the patients and hardware phantom showed that voxel‐wise quantification of myocardium perfusion is feasible and can be used to detect abnormal regions. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R. Wilson,et al.  Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. , 1998, Medical physics.

[2]  E. Nagel,et al.  Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[3]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Optimal Choice of AR and MA Parts in Autoregressive Moving Average Models , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  M. Jerosch-Herold,et al.  Myocardial blood flow quantification with MRI by model-independent deconvolution. , 2002, Medical physics.

[5]  E. DiBella,et al.  Comparison of myocardial perfusion estimates from dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with four quantitative analysis methods , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  P. Boesiger,et al.  k-Space and time sensitivity encoding-accelerated myocardial perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: comparison with 1.5 T. , 2008, Radiology.

[7]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Extended graphical model for analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  L. Schumaker Spline Functions: Basic Theory , 1981 .

[9]  R. Balaban,et al.  Absolute myocardial perfusion in canines measured by using dual-bolus first-pass MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[11]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  P. Kellman,et al.  Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual‐bolus contrast‐enhanced first‐pass MRI technique in humans , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  T. Ichihara,et al.  Quantitative analysis of first‐pass contrast‐enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI using a patlak plot method and blood saturation correction , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Didier Revel,et al.  Mapping myocardial perfusion with an intravascular MR contrast agent: Robustness of deconvolution methods at various blood flows , 2002, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[15]  Stephen L. Keeling,et al.  Deconvolution for DCE-MRI using an exponential approximation basis , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[16]  E. Fleck,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Measurements for the Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2003, Circulation.

[17]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Myocardial blood flow measurement by PET: technical aspects and clinical applications. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  N. Wilke,et al.  Analysis of myocardial perfusion MRI , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  J. G. De Gooijer,et al.  Methods for Determining the Order of an Autoregressive-Moving Average Process: A , 1985 .

[20]  E. Rostrup,et al.  Myocardial perfusion modeling using MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  A L Alexander,et al.  Comparison of temporal filtering methods for dynamic contrast MRI myocardial perfusion studies , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  H. Oswald,et al.  Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2000, Circulation.

[23]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI accelerated with k‐t sense , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  S Sourbron,et al.  Pixel-by-pixel deconvolution of bolus-tracking data: optimization and implementation , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  E. DiBella,et al.  Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[26]  Daniel C. Lee,et al.  Quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[27]  E. Fleck,et al.  The role of dobutamine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the clinical management of patients with suspected and known coronary artery disease , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[28]  K. Zierler Indicator Dilution Methods for Measuring Blood Flow, Volume, and Other Properties of Biological Systems: A Brief History and Memoir , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  E. Fleck,et al.  MR myocardial perfusion imaging with k-space and time broad-use linear acquisition speed-up technique: feasibility study. , 2007, Radiology.

[30]  P. Batchelor,et al.  Dynamic simulation of first pass myocardial perfusion MR with a novel perfusion phantom , 2011, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[31]  J. Lindsey,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Models for Pharmacokinetic Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[32]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Automatic Detection of Myocardial Boundaries in MR Cardio Perfusion Images , 2001, MICCAI.

[33]  Robert Fildes,et al.  Methods for determining the order of an autoregressive-moving average process: a survey: Jan G. De Gooijer, Bovas Abraham, Ann Gould and Lecily Robinson, International Statistical Review 53 (1985) 301–329 , 1986 .

[34]  R Luypaert,et al.  Quantification of perfusion and permeability in breast tumors with a deconvolution‐based analysis of second‐bolus T1‐DCE data , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  Noise measurement from magnitude MRI using local estimates of variance and skewness , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  Zoran Cvetkovic,et al.  ARMA regularization of cardiac perfusion modeling , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[37]  M. Jerosch-Herold Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[38]  R. Wilson,et al.  Myocardial perfusion reserve: assessment with multisection, quantitative, first-pass MR imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[39]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[40]  Luuk J. Spreeuwers,et al.  Automatic quantitative analysis of cardiac MR perfusion images , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.