Hitting a robot vs. hitting a human: Is it the same?
暂无分享，去创建一个
The present project aimed to study how people make moral judgment for human versus robot behaviors. Ten transgression scenarios were presented to the participants with either a human or a robot as the perpetrator or the victim. Results showed that most of the transgressions were perceived as less immoral when it was acted on a robot than on a human. Moral judgments for human behaviors were more intuitive and emotion based. Moral judgments for robot behaviors involve both intuition and cognitive reasoning. Possible psychological causes were discussed.
[1] E. Turiel,et al. The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention , 1983 .
[2] J. Haidt. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.
[3] December,et al. The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules , 2007 .