Sustainable Urban Regeneration Policy Making: Inclusive Participation Practice

In physical and economic planning at both urban and regional scale, the role of participation is a key element of the planning process. Participation is often linked to organization forms (we call it “structures of participation”) that find a heterogeneous applications in the Urban Center model. This work analyses the first results of Project CAST (Active Citizenship for Sustainable Development of Territory), especially those related to the neighbourhood of Poggio Tre Galli in Potenza (Italy), where the test of a traditional/technological participatory approach has allowed the development of urban regeneration scenarios characterized by an inclusive approach “Citizens centred”. This is an operative contribution in terms of Inclusive Smart Planning, and so of evolutionary 2.0 approaches oriented to an inclusive and participative urban management through ICT tools. A singular feature of the ICT platform developed during the project CAST is the integration of management tools and streaming analysis of the main social networks with a SDI. The experience, described both in quantitative terms and as a strategic design of urban regeneration at neighbourhood scale, shows from one hand the request of bottom-up contributions, especially from institutions (i.e. Municipality), on the other hand, the need to test effective solutions to balance the commitment to manage and configure complex information systems according to quality results. Research perspectives look at the definition of web-assisted procedures for the participation in urban and territorial government choices that can reinforce bottom-up practices such as DSS, starting from ICT tools tested during the project CAST.

[1]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  La pianificazione del territorio extra-urbano di Potenza , 2000 .

[2]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Using participative GIS and e-tools for involving citizens of Marmo Platano–Melandro area in European programming activities , 2011 .

[3]  Maria Cerreta,et al.  A Multi-Methodological Decision-Making Process for Cultural Landscapes Evaluation: The Green Lucania Project , 2016 .

[4]  Raffaele Attardi,et al.  Valuing Cultural Landscape Services: A Multidimensional and Multi-group SDSS for Scenario Simulations , 2014, ICCSA.

[5]  Daniela Luisi,et al.  Dinamiche inclusive e costruzione dell’agency nelle politiche pubbliche partecipate , 2016 .

[6]  Gilroy Coleman,et al.  Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects , 1987 .

[7]  Valerio Cutini,et al.  Ai tempi della crisi. il mercato immobiliare e le influenze sulla pianificazione , 2016 .

[8]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Regional Local Development Strategies Benefiting from Open Data and Open Tools and an Outlook on the Renewable Energy Sources Contribution , 2016 .

[9]  V. Lanza D.C. Prosperi Collaborative e-governance: Describing and pre-calibrating the digital milieu in urban and regional planning , 2009 .

[10]  Francesco Scorza,et al.  Citizen Participation and Technologies: The C.A.S.T. Architecture , 2015, ICCSA.

[11]  Beniamino Murgante,et al.  Urban Residential Land Value Analysis: The Case of Potenza , 2013, ICCSA.

[12]  Alan Wilson,et al.  New roles for urban models: planning for the long term , 2016 .

[13]  Piergiuseppe Pontrandolfi Contenuti strategici della pianificazione ed esperienze di partecipazione ai processi decisionali , 2010 .