Optimization of PET instrumentation for brain activation studies

By performing cerebral blood flow studies with positron emission tomography (PET) and comparing blood flow images of different states of activation, functional mapping of the brain is possible. The ability of current commercial instruments to perform such studies is investigated in the present work, based on a comparison of noise equivalent control (NEC) rates. Differences in the NEC performance of the different scanners in conjunction with scanner design parameters provide insights into the importance of block design, (size, dead time and crystal thickness) and overall scanner design (sensitivity and scatter fraction) for optimizing data from activation studies. The newer scanners with removable septa, operating with 3-D acquisition, have much higher sensitivity but require new methodology for optimized operation. Only by administering multiple low doses (fractionation) of the flow tracer can the high sensitivity be utilized. >

[1]  C. Bohm,et al.  A study of the possibility of using multi-slice PET systems for 3D imaging , 1989 .

[2]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Performance evaluation of the PC-2048: a new 15-slice encoded-crystal PET scanner for neurological studies. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[3]  S R Cherry,et al.  3D PET using a conventional multislice tomograph without septa. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[5]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Improved Detection of Focal Cerebral Blood Flow Changes Using Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Tomography , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  M. Defrise,et al.  Three dimensional reconstruction of PET data from a multi-ring camera , 1989 .

[7]  S Grootoonk,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Positron Scanner ECAT EXACT , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[9]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Performance standards in positron emission tomography. , 1991, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 4. Effect of Accidental Coincidences , 1981, Journal of computer assisted tomography.