Ontology learning methods from text - an extensive knowledge-based approach

Abstract Ontologies are a key element of the Semantic Web. They aim to capture basic knowledge by providing appropriate terms and formal relationships between them, so that they can be used in a machine-processable manner. Accordingly they enable automatic aggregation and practical use as well as unexpected reuse of distributed data sources. Ontologies may come from many different sources, pursuing different goals and quality criteria. However, performed manually ontology construction is a very complex and tedious task, thus many methods proposed offer automatic or semi-automatic way for ontology construction. Many of the methods have their own, specific features. Therefore, this paper proposes an extensive knowledge-based approach covering the domain of ontology learning methods from text. This work aims to collect the knowledge of available approaches for ontology learning and the prominent differences between them, drawing on best practices in ontology engineering. The proposed approach refers to methods and aims to enrich knowledge in the field of ontology learning (OL). In this paper, the author’s ontology contains a set of various types of methods with main techniques used, and the necessary features in the miscellaneous approaches. The proposed an extensive knowledge-based approach uses a reasoning mechanism based on competency questions for individual approaches to determine their ontology learning method profiles. The validation stage has also been carried out. At the same time, it is an extension of the previous study in the form of a repository of knowledge about OL tools. In addition, the combination of both ontologies: tools and methods aim to provide a more efficient OL solution from text.

[1]  Agnieszka Konys,et al.  Knowledge Repository of Ontology Learning Tools from Text , 2019, KES.

[2]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning for the Semantic Web , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[3]  Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska,et al.  User-Driven Innovation in Poland: Determinants and Recommendations , 2019, Sustainability.

[4]  Farookh Khadeer Hussain,et al.  A Framework for Measuring Ontology Usage on the Web , 2013, Comput. J..

[5]  Hans Tompits,et al.  Reasoning with Rules and Ontologies , 2006, Reasoning Web.

[6]  Reyes Juárez-Ramírez,et al.  Automated Ontology Extraction from Unstructured Texts using Deep Learning , 2020, Intuitionistic and Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Enhancements in Neural and Optimization Algorithms.

[7]  Bálint Molnár,et al.  Use of Ontology Learning in Information System Integration: A Literature Survey , 2020, ACIIDS.

[8]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  Ontology enrichment with texts from the WWW , 2002 .

[9]  Raphaël Troncy,et al.  Semantic Commitment for Designing Ontologies: A Proposal , 2002, EKAW.

[10]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  Learning domain ontologies for semantic Web service descriptions , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[11]  Artur Karczmarczyk,et al.  Using the COMET Method in the Sustainable City Transport Problem: an Empirical Study of the Electric Powered Cars , 2018, KES.

[12]  Agnieszka Konys,et al.  Knowledge systematization for ontology learning methods , 2018, KES.

[13]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Learning domain ontologies from engineering documents for manufacturing knowledge reuse by a biologically inspired approach , 2020 .

[14]  Samhaa R. El-Beltagy,et al.  A Survey of Ontology Learning Approaches , 2011 .

[15]  Paola Velardi,et al.  The Usable Ontology: An Environment for Building and Assessing a Domain Ontology , 2002, SEMWEB.

[16]  Mohammed Bennamoun,et al.  Ontology learning from text: A look back and into the future , 2012, CSUR.

[17]  Konys,et al.  Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base , 2019, Sustainability.

[18]  Krzysztof Palczewski,et al.  The fuzzy TOPSIS applications in the last decade , 2019, KES.

[19]  Shomona Gracia Jacob,et al.  An automated ontology learning for benchmarking classifier models through gain-based relative-non-redundant feature selection: a case-study with erythemato-squamous disease , 2020, Int. J. Bus. Intell. Data Min..

[20]  Amal Zouaq,et al.  A Survey of Domain Ontology Engineering: Methods and Tools , 2010, Advances in Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[21]  Sylvie Szulman,et al.  TERMINAE: A Linguistic-Based Tool for the Building of a Domain Ontology , 1999, EKAW.

[22]  Juho Hamari,et al.  A gradual approach for maximising user conversion without compromising experience with high visual intensity website elements , 2019, Internet Res..

[23]  Tabasam Rashid,et al.  A New Method to Support Decision-Making in an Uncertain Environment Based on Normalized Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy Numbers and COMET Technique , 2020, Symmetry.

[24]  Jarosław Jankowski,et al.  An Index to Measure the Sustainable Information Society: The Polish Households Case , 2018, Sustainability.

[25]  Agnieszka Konys,et al.  Approach to Practical Ontology Design for Supporting COTS Component Selection Processes , 2013, ACIIDS.

[26]  Jaroslaw Jankowski,et al.  Knowledge management in MCDA domain , 2015, 2015 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[27]  G. Ioppolo,et al.  Innovation level and local development of EU regions. A new assessment approach , 2020 .

[28]  Jarosław Wątróbski,et al.  Outline of Multicriteria Decision-making in Green Logistics☆ , 2016 .

[29]  Dan I. Moldovan,et al.  An Interactive Tool for the Rapid Development of Knowledge Bases , 2001, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.