Higher education outcomes, graduate employment and university performance indicators

Official employment-related Performance Indicators in UK Higher Education are based on the population of students responding to the First Destination Supplement (FDS). This generates potentially biased performance indicators as this population of students is not necessarily representative of the full population of leavers from each institution. University leavers not obtaining qualifications and those not responding to the FDS are not included within the official analysis. We compare an employment-related performance indicator based on those students responding to the FDS with alternative approaches which address the potential non-random nature of this sub-group of university leavers.

[1]  J. Johnes,et al.  The Research Performance of UK Universities: a Statistical Analysis of the Results of the 1989 Research Selectivity Exercise , 1993 .

[2]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth rates. , 1998, BMJ.

[3]  W. V. D. Ven,et al.  The demand for deductibles in private health insurance: A probit model with sample selection , 1981 .

[4]  Stephen Hanney,et al.  The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education: The Challenge of the Quality Movement. Third Edition. Higher Education Policy Series 34. , 1996 .

[5]  Robin Naylor,et al.  Determinants of Degree Performance in UK Universities: A Statistical Analysis of the 1993 Student Cohort , 2001 .

[6]  Robin Naylor,et al.  Dropping out of university: A statistical analysis of the probability of withdrawal for UK university students , 2001 .

[7]  J. G. Cragg.  Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[8]  W. Greene.  Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[9]  Willard G. Manning,et al.  Monte Carlo evidence on the choice between sample selection and two-part models , 1987 .

[10]  R. Ball,et al.  Performance indicators in higher education , 1987 .

[11]  G. Johnes,et al.  Never Give Up on the Good Times: Student Attrition in the UK , 2004 .

[12]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[13]  P. Maassen,et al.  Peer review en performance indicators : Quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education , 1990 .

[14]  Patrick A. Puhani,et al.  The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique - A Short Survey , 2000 .

[15]  Robert McNabb,et al.  Gender Differences in Educational Attainment: The Case of University Students in England and Wales , 2002 .

[16]  Jeremy P. Smith,et al.  Graduate Employability: Policy and Performance in Higher Education in the UK , 2000 .

[17]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance , 1996 .