In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?

Recent studies have revealed that the deployment of attention can be biased by the content of visual working memory (VWM), but that stored memories do not always interact with attention. This has led to a model which proposes a division within VWM between a single active template that interacts with perception and multiple accessory representations that do not. The present study was designed to study whether multiple memory representations are able to bias attention. Participants performed a visual search task while maintaining a variable number of colors in VWM. Consistent with earlier findings, we observed increased attentional capture by memory related distractors when VWM was filled with a single item. However, memory related capture was no longer present for memory loads beyond a single item. The absence of memory related capture at higher VWM loads was independent of individual VWM capacity, nor was it attributable to weaker encoding, forgetting, or reduced precision of memory representations. When analyses were limited to those trials in which participants had a relatively precise memory, there was still no sign of attentional guidance at higher loads. However, when observers were cued toward a specific memory item after encoding, interference with search returned. These results are consistent with a distinction within VWM between representations that interact with perception and those that do not, and show that only a single VWM representation at a time can interact with visual attention.

[1]  Valerie M. Beck,et al.  Simultaneous Control of Attention by Multiple Working Memory Representations , 2012, Psychological science.

[2]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[4]  E. Miller,et al.  Task-Dependent Changes in Short-Term Memory in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  H Pashler,et al.  Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury’s hypothesis , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[7]  R. Goebel,et al.  Task-Relevant and Accessory Items in Working Memory Have Opposite Effects on Activity in Extrastriate Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  I. A. Clark,et al.  Attention Restores Discrete Items to Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, Psychological science.

[9]  P. Goldman-Rakic Cellular basis of working memory , 1995, Neuron.

[10]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding Seen and Attended Motion Directions from Activity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[11]  Katherine Sledge Moore,et al.  Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Paul M Bays,et al.  The precision of visual working memory is set by allocation of a shared resource. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[13]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  Remembered but Unused: The Accessory Items in Working Memory that Do Not Guide Attention , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  David Soto,et al.  Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Neural Evidence for a Distinction between Short-term Memory and the Focus of Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  R. Desimone,et al.  Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex during Memory- Guided Visual Search , 1998 .

[19]  Rachel S. Sussman,et al.  Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  David Soto,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for attentional guidance by the contents of working memory , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[23]  M. Adamo,et al.  Multiple attentional control settings influence late attentional selection but do not provide an early attentional filter , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[24]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[25]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  Looking, language, and memory: bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[27]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  M. Tsodyks,et al.  Synaptic Theory of Working Memory , 2008, Science.

[29]  C. Bundesen A theory of visual attention. , 1990, Psychological review.

[30]  N. Sigala,et al.  Dynamic Coding for Cognitive Control in Prefrontal Cortex , 2013, Neuron.

[31]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[32]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dividing the mind: The necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  C. Bundesen,et al.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. , 2005, Psychological review.

[34]  Pieter R Roelfsema,et al.  Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time , 2009, Psychological research.

[35]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  W. B. Pillsbury On meaning: A symposium before the Western Philosophical Association, December, 1907. , 2022 .

[37]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[38]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Memory-driven attentional capture is modulated by temporal task demands , 2011 .

[39]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[41]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  The guidance effect of working memory load on visual search , 2010 .

[42]  A. Nobre,et al.  Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations , 2006, Brain Research.

[43]  C. Folk,et al.  Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[45]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[47]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[48]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[49]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[50]  Earl K Miller,et al.  The representation of multiple objects in prefrontal neuronal delay activity. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[51]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Attention on our mind: the role of spatial attention in visual working memory. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[53]  David Soto,et al.  Competition in working memory reduces frontal guidance of visual selection. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[54]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[56]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[57]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2004 .

[58]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Spatially Global Representations in Human Primary Visual Cortex during Working Memory Maintenance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  W. Ma,et al.  A detection theory account of change detection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[61]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[62]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Attentional Templates in Visual Working Memory , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.

[64]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The relationship between visual working memory and attention: retention of precise colour information in the absence of effects on perceptual selection , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  Suiping Wang,et al.  Effects of load on the guidance of visual attention from working memory , 2011, Vision Research.

[66]  Christian N. L. Olivers,et al.  The time course of working memory effects on visual attention , 2010 .