Evaluation of the Q-method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators

Abstract The complexity of sustainable development means that it is often difficult to evaluate and communicate the concept effectively. One standard method to reduce complexity and improve communication, while maintaining scientific objectivity, is to use selected indicators. The aim of this paper is to describe and evaluate a process of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators that utilised the Q-method for discourse analysis. The Q-method was utilised to combine public opinion with technical expertise to create a list of technically robust indicators that would be relevant to the public. The method comprises statement collection, statement analysis, Q-sorts and Q-sort analysis. The results of the Q-method generated a list of statements for which a preliminary list of indicators was then developed by a team of experts from the fields of environmental science, sustainable development and psychology. Subsequently members of the public evaluated the preliminary list of indicators, to select a final list of indicators that were both technically sound and incorporated the views of the public. The utilisation of the Q-method in this process was evaluated using previously published criteria. The application of the Q-method in this context needs to be considered not only by the quality of the indicators developed, but also from the perspective of the benefit of the process to the participants. It was concluded that the Q-method provided an effective framework for public participation in the selection of indicators as it allowed the public to discuss sustainable development in familiar language and in the context of their daily lives. By combining this information with expert input, a list of technically robust indicators that resonate with the public was developed. The results demonstrated that many citizens are not aware of sustainable development, and if it is to be successfully communicated to them, then indicators and policy need to be couched in terms familiar and relevant to citizen and communities.

[1]  Tim Richardson,et al.  Placing the public in integrated transport planning , 2001 .

[2]  H. Addams,et al.  Social Discourse and Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[3]  Job van Exel,et al.  Q methodology: A sneak preview , 2005 .

[4]  Geraint Ellis,et al.  Discourses of Objection: Towards an Understanding of Third-Party Rights in Planning , 2003 .

[6]  Kent Gustavson,et al.  Selection and modeling of sustainable development indicators: a case study of the Fraser River Basin, British Columbia , 1999 .

[7]  Ortwin Renn.  Participatory processes for designing environmental policies , 2006 .

[8]  David J. Pannell,et al.  Sustainable Agriculture: A Matter of Ecology, Equity, Economic Efficiency or Expedience? , 1999 .

[9]  J. Barry,et al.  Environment and Social Theory , 1999 .

[10]  Gordon Walker,et al.  TRANSPORT PLANNING AND PARTICIPATION: THE RHETORIC AND REALITIES OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT , 2002 .

[11]  Charles C. Harris,et al.  A participatory approach to social impact assessment: The interactive community forum , 2003 .

[12]  V. Mega,et al.  Cities inventing the civilisation of sustainability: an odyssey in the urban archipelago of the European Union , 2000 .

[13]  Steven R. Brown.  A Primer on Q Methodology , 1993, Operant Subjectivity.

[14]  Shu-li Huang,et al.  A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei's urban sustainability , 1998 .

[15]  N. A. Glenn,et al.  A framework for the economic evaluation and selection of sustainability indicators in agriculture , 2000 .

[16]  Jayanath Ananda,et al.  Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach , 2003 .

[17]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Public involvement on a regional scale , 2001 .

[18]  M. Dooris.  Healthy Cities and Local Agenda 21: the UK experience—challenges for the new millennium , 1999 .

[19]  John S. Dryzek,et al.  Reconstructive Democratic Theory , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[20]  John Barry,et al.  Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology , 1999 .

[21]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation , 1997 .

[22]  Mika Marttunen,et al.  Public involvement in multi-objective water level regulation development projects—evaluating the applicability of public involvement methods , 2005 .

[23]  G. Ellis,et al.  Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-Methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals , 2007 .

[24]  Gerald J. Miller,et al.  Handbook of research methods in public administration , 1999 .

[25]  D. Bryant,et al.  Environmental indicators : a systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development , 1995 .