Information literacy skills of occupational therapy graduates: a survey of learning outcomes.

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to assess whether recent graduates of the Ohio State University's Occupational Therapy division are applying information-seeking skills they learned as undergraduates, and to seek their advice on ways to improve information-literacy instruction for current and future occupational therapy students. METHOD A survey was sent to a sample of graduates from 1995-2000. The results were entered into an SPSS database, and descriptive and inferential results were calculated to determine the information-seeking patterns of these recent graduates. RESULTS A majority of the occupational therapy graduates who responded to the survey prefer to use information resources that are readily available to them, such as advice from their colleagues or supervisors (79%) and the Internet (69%), rather than the evidence available in the journal literature. Twenty-six percent (26%) of the graduates have searched MEDLINE or CINAHL at least once since they graduated. Formal library instruction sessions were considered useful by 42% of the graduates, and 22% of the graduates found informal contacts with librarians to be useful. CONCLUSIONS Librarians and occupational therapy faculty must intensify their efforts to convey the importance of applying research information to patient care and inform students of ways to access this information after they graduate. In addition to teaching searching skills for MEDLINE and CINAHL, they must provide instruction on how to assess the quality of information they find on the Internet. Other findings suggest that occupational therapy practitioners need access to information systems in the clinical setting that synthesize the research in a way that is readily applicable to patient-care issues.

[1]  Ronald R. Powell,et al.  Basic Research Methods for Librarians , 1985 .

[2]  Developing information-seeking skills in occupational therapy students. , 1989, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  H. R. Kells Self-study processes : a guide to self-evaluation in higher education , 1995 .

[4]  N. White,et al.  A multidimensional evaluation of a nursing information-literacy program. , 1996, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[5]  Ronald R. Powell,et al.  Basic Research Methods for Librarians, 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[6]  Bonnie Gratch Lindauer Defining and Measuring the Library’s Impact on Campuswide Outcomes , 1998 .

[7]  M. McKnight,et al.  Health Care Providers' Information Seeking , 2000, Medical reference services quarterly.

[8]  Julie L Rabine,et al.  Start making sense: Practical approaches to outcomes assessment for libraries , 2000 .

[9]  Kenneth R. Smith New Roles and Responsibilities for the University Library , 2001 .

[10]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  G. Tomlin,et al.  Factors related to evidence-based practice among U.S. occupational therapy clinicians. , 2002, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.